TPO 22 Task 2
Teachers are the source of delivering the light of education and they have great impacts on the life of students. Personally, I believe that teachers should not reveal their views regarding social or political to the students. I feel this way for a number of reasons, which I will explore in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, people in the classroom should learn to take unbiased decisions or hold neutral opinion without fully convinced by any situation. In addition, they should be taught the difference between right and wrong so that they can take decision by their own. On the other hand, if the mentors provide their personal view of any condition, sometimes the students get biased as they are influenced by them. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly supported by my own experience. When I was in my undergraduate school, one of my peers got affected by a professor's viewpoint about a political group. Furthermore, he was so attracted by the fair sides of that particular group, so he forgot about his self-choice. As a result, his judgment about a government team got changed overnight. If the lecturer had not expressed his opinion, my friend would not have lost his independent thinking capability.
Secondly, social views are important in everyone's life, but it should be come up from the individual's mind. There will be contradiction in social views as everyone's judging capability is not the same. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was in my primary school, one of our class teacher told us that she liked social gathering. Moreover, this type of get together enabled people to communicate more effectively, and everyone should attend those events. However, not all human beings like gatherings, yet some people prefer to spend lonely time. Therefore, students might have been forced to attend those social parties without having any interest, just because they are learned this behaviour in schools.
In light of the above-mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that it is not pivotal to deliver the social or political views to the students in the teaching period. This is because this practice can hamper people's independent thinking, and sometimes persuade the children to do tasks unintentionally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | SaniyaYesmin | 3 | view |
- TPO 22 Task 2 3
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement.For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 78
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist.“Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia andconcluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire villagerat 43
- TOEFL Official Guide - Practice Test 2 - Integrated Writing - Professors on TV 3
- Investing in research which may have controversial results 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...hool, one of my peers got affected by a professors viewpoint about a political group. Furt...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'come'?
Suggestion: come
...ant in everyones life, but it should be come up from the individuals mind. There wil...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, i feel, in addition, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 376.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10106382979 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89003611344 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6439486563 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.9 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0128998612992 0.236089414692 5% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00393544697456 0.076458572812 5% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0171542156598 0.0737576698707 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0144741753573 0.150856017488 10% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0250700071165 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.