Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not?
Recently, an ongoing debate on extreme sports which resembles to go around on diverse issues, one of the principal upshots “is there reason to support these activities?” because distinct prudence subsists to expound that sports like bungee jumping seem more injurious rather than constructive. <pwa data-pwa-id="pwa-DD88A6A1AA729600162AAD1E326E461E" data-pwa-rule-id="MISSING_CAP_START" data-pwa-category="grammar" data-pwa-hint="Missing capitalization at the start of a sentence" data-pwa-suggestions="My" data-pwa-heavy="false" data-pwa-dictionary-word="my" class="pwa-mark pwa-mark-done">my</pwa> stance vindicates the negative traits than the positive on great sports the subsequent will elaborate on both perspectives of the aim and succeed with clear ideas.
From the sports medicine standpoint, it bound adventurous sports up overwhelming with youth interest, which shows they lead to both mental and physical health. As a well-known example, the relationship between risky sports and excitement are an exponential increase in the adrenalin rush. <pwa data-pwa-id="pwa-BD2EB3BB68BB792262BBFEDC94653F06" data-pwa-rule-id="MISSING_CAP_START" data-pwa-category="grammar" data-pwa-hint="Missing capitalization at the start of a sentence" data-pwa-suggestions="My" data-pwa-heavy="false" data-pwa-dictionary-word="my" class="pwa-mark pwa-mark-done">my</pwa> pragmatic evidence presented supports the contention it correlates positively with the likelihood of being life-threatening with not only serious injuries but also reducing depression in risk-taking sports.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, exciting sports attribute to social inequalities, in that it would come down to lucrative sports, and fame and fortune for athletes. A salient example of such attribution is spectator sports, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take these stressful situations for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have pinpointed the recreational sport's problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of socioeconomic dimensions of extreme sports.
Despite the circumstances, there are perpetual robust contentions from both dissensions of the dialectic, the notion of extreme sports is that I would tout dangerous sports will bring confidence to the sportsman in real life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | Jasmaansingh1996 | 72 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | msgnaneswaran | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-29 | maniram vicky | 72 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | dilroop | 55 | view |
- some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 85
- some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 77
- Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagree. Discuss both views and giveyour opinion. 55
- Some people claim that public transport should be free of charge, while other disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Some organizations integrate employees in decision making process of their goods and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...nd succeed with clear ideas. From the sports medicine standpoint, it bound adventuro...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2234.0 1207.87684729 185% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 7.57288135593 5.00649968141 151% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 8.36125178765 2.71678728327 308% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 190.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64406779661 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 379.143842365 167% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.1 1.57093596059 134% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 170.279887245 50.4703680194 337% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 223.4 104.977214359 213% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 29.5 20.9669160288 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.25397266985 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0479327430083 0.242375264174 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045555948077 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0219341069359 0.071462118173 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0521780204095 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328473862973 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 29.0 12.6369458128 229% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -0.26 53.1260098522 -0% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.5 10.9458128079 187% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 27.22 11.5310837438 236% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 22.5 9.94827586207 226% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 29.0 10.5123152709 276% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.