"Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem."
I don’t exactly concede with the author that “Research shouldn’t be concerned with it’s impact on society. Although there are factors such as self-interest that motivates someone to do research, it’s a bold statement to make researchers shouldn’t worry about their research’s impact.
In the slightest favour of the author’s argument, I acknowledge that significant research output can’t be possible to achieve if the researcher is not interested in it. According to a famous author “Everything is driven by fear or self-interest.” So self-interest is a tantamount factor in every form of study or research.
Also, every contribution to research is not just seen in terms of contribution to larger society. Most forms of research have some extent of impact to either researcher’s community or fulfilling student’s curiosity and learning. For example, theoritical research such as maths doesn’t have a direct impact on a larger society. But in bigger prospect, It helps the engineer community to innovate and design products based on those research, which have a direct impact.
However, the second statement of the author is highly critical to defend, as if any research doesn’t contain any fruitful outcome or any means of contribution to society, there isn’t any good reason to fund these research. The same resources can be used elsewhere to benefit other dedicated, hard-working researchers in the field who are really thriving to make an impact on the world, but don’t have the right opportunities to do so.
In a conclusive prospective, unusual or idiosyncratic research such as in the field of black magic, discovering eternity, can be potential a waste of resources, but some unusual research such as exploring the world, looking the life pattern of wild animals, and discovering the new ways of achieving internal happiness, these can be useful to a portion of audience and can bring social, and environmental diversity and moral happiness.
- The following appeared in a magazine article about planning for retirement."Because of its spectacular natural beauty and consistent climate, Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire. As a bonus, housing costs in Clearview hav 55
- The following is a recommendation from the director of personnel to the president ofProfessional Printing Company."In a recent telephone survey of automobile factory workers, older employees were less likelyto report that having a supervisor present 77
- "Scholars and researchers should not be concerned with whether their work makes a contribution to the larger society. It is more important that they pursue their individual interests, however unusual or idiosyncratic those interests may seem." 50
- Men and Women because of their physical difference, are not suited to every tasks. 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, really, second, so, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 311.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61736334405 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.50262180492 2.79657885939 125% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559485530547 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.636916834 60.3974514979 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.818181818 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2727272727 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171052170888 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827780077688 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328864750254 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102644737534 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214263174322 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 14.1392134831 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 48.8420337079 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.1639044944 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.