Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Leaders become famous because they possess a set of qualities. Few unique qualities may distinguish them from one and another but it is the common set of qualities that lays down the base. Maintaining respect for peers is one of the crucial ones.
Understanding the importance of "basics" is applied in numerous fields - be it learning, sports, leadership, etc. And one of the major basic qualities that a leader must have is to respect his peers. By definition, a leader is responsible to enable a group of people to follow him on the path to righteousness. Leaders are not expected to single-handedly deliver the assigned task. This can be seen from Presidents to a primary school teacher. Presidents are elected because of their strong sense of judgment - the ability to do the right thing in the most serious circumstances. However, even they rely on the opinion of others to make a sound decision. After all, a leader is also a human.
It goes without saying that a person who respects others is set to gain respect back from them. This is applicable to leaders too. A tyrant leader like Hitler - looking to establish a dictatorship of himself was not respected by other world leaders at the time. Leaders like Hitler who tend to think themselves as the supreme most human being create a false identity of themselves in their subconscious. When actually, a group of leaders can come together and guarantee the destruction of his superiority.
There is no doubt that leaders have to take a decision in one of the most stressful environments - when their sound moral judgment tends to help them a lot. But these decisions will be well received in the community and by his peers if he shows respect to his peer's decision. Pep Guardiola - the famous football coach that lead Barcelona, Bayern Munich, and Manchester City to numerous victories under his leadership. In his acceptance speech for the best football coach of the year he made a point to remember his peer Sir Alex Ferguson and acknowledged the tough competition he faced from his team.
A leader becomes a leader because he has the ability to make sound decisions. But a leader evolves to be a great leader by learning from his peers. And respecting them is the base to show the willingness to become a great leader.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | arpit6798 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 50
- Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 703, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n. After all, a leader is also a human. It goes without saying that a person who...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, look, may, so, well, after all, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85750636132 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89161814886 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526717557252 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3402831978 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0869565217 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21739130435 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238843915244 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746479566249 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470883125518 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140326524989 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583260521558 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.