Government spending on restoration of old buildings in cities should be stopped.
Instead they should spend the money for housing and road development.
Do you agree or disagree?
A section of society asserts that the government should not squander money on repairing broken and damaged buildings, and instead the authorities should invest this portion of funds in the development of houses and roads. I agree with the assertion and think that modern problems require modern solutions. Hence, there is a pressing need to develop more residential areas and roadways.
The population explosion has become the root cause of various problems, especially in urban areas. As more people relocate to the cities in search of better opportunities and a modern lifestyle, they exert immense pressure on the existing infrastructure of the city. Therefore, before investing money in ancient and dilapidated structures, there is a dire need to improve the current facilities, such as streets, roads, lightening and housing, for the survival of the city. By shifting the monetary funds from repair work of old buildings to enhancing the modern architecture, the government can provide shelter to homeless people. For instance, the cost that is being spent in the restoration work of an old building is sufficient to erect an entirely new building which will not only have 5 to 10 times more capacity but also will be equipped with modern amenities.
Furthermore, modern buildings are designed to cater to the needs of the current population, whereas older buildings were built based on the plans of the former times. The establishment of rising skylines and towers, tailored to contain facilities such as water and gas pipelines and electricity, is an illustration of the paradigm shift that has taken place in order to meet the demands of the modern population.
To conclude, a radical change is required in the way the government address the problems of highly populated cities. The government ought to focus more on the current conditions of a city, and hence, spending on residential and transportation sector would be a sensible decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-04 | canada_prep_ielts | 78 | view |
- The number of older people is increasing Some people think it will cause a problem to their countries others believe this group is important to society Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Some people think that children who spend a lot of time reading children's story books are wasting their time which could be better used doing other more useful activities.To what extent do you agree? 84
- Government spending on restoration of old buildings in cities should be stopped.Instead they should spend the money for housing and road development.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Many countries are experiencing population growth and a need for more homes. Should these new homes be constructed in the existing cities or should new towns be built for this purpose? Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the demands of the modern population. To conclude, a radical change is require...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25796178344 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9498784778 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582802547771 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.5549652746 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.583333333 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211110706754 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601158481466 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0570522057164 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107974933136 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486837147116 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.