Some people believe that social networking sites are not doing enough to protect users' privacy. However, others believe that it is not the responsibility of the sites; instead, users should be more careful about what they make available online.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Two days ago, I read an article about who is in charge of protecting private life on social networking. Some social workers state that these websites should take responsibility for providing it. However, some website designers claim that users should care about it themselves. In this essay, I will examine both points of view and agree with the idea of obliging social networking sites to secure privacy.
Let us start with the reasons why some social workers argue that these social websites should protect confidentiality. The first reason is that they usually keep personal information in their databases. Social networking sites can easily restrict the access to private details, such as photos and phone numbers, since they have store and grant permission in their own data centers. Another reason is that they let others browse the personal information without alerting the owners by default. Many social networking websites leave the information relating to personal viewable on the web, which criminals can take advantage of against the owners. Therefore, after analyzing these reasons, it is clear that social networking sites should limit access to the personal data.
Nevertheless, some website designers advocate that users should manage their personal information on their own. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, they have the right to decide what to do with their private information. People generally want to decide themselves either to open or close their front pages to the world, so it would be unfair, if websites did it for them. Secondly, this type of websites often provide various safety options for users to choose from. Facebook, for example, allows people to hide their pages either partly or totally, so they can grant a limited number of people access to their personal life. As a result, after considering these arguments, it is obvious that people should individually take care of their privacy on social networking sites.
In conclusion, although some website designers say that users should take responsibility for the safety of their personal data, I believe that social networking sites should take measures instead of individuals for the above mentioned reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-01 | saipriyanka | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | Tolik | 88 | view |
- Some people think that parents should give their children complete freedom Others feel that parents should limit their children s freedom Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
- Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.To what extent do you agree? 11
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff all times, especially holidays.Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 56
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of living and working in a foreign country. 73
- Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.To what extent do you agree? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37784090909 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63252653513 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528409090909 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9557984128 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.166666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281671003957 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940819390332 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589541366676 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190178775154 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447989462498 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.