Many companies sponser sport as way of advertising.
The notion conerning sponsering the sports by comalnis as channel of promotion seems ti trigger a considerable debate. An opinion in this regard advocated by a cluster of like-minded people is that using sports by companies as medium for advertistement is benefical for sport. Others, however take a dim view of it and observe that it has a drawbacks. The upcoimg paragraph will analyse these twain sides in advance of my personal viewpoint.
The proponents of former view assert that sports sponsership by companies have a benefits. In the first place, it is true tgat comanies are sponser sports to promote their products or services, but it is neglisible that these companies are necessary or support to raise the standard of games or sport. However, various leagues and tournaments are orgnised and sponsered by many companies, which promoting the sport as a career for many individuals. As and illustratuion, BCCI start the indian premier league, which is sponsered by many companies and because of this league standard ofcricket games rise to upper level.
Nevertheless, many individuals does not follow suit and reckons that orgnisation use players as brand ambessedor because many people have a blind faith on these players. Sometimes companies take advantage of this blimd faith and sold cheap and defected products to coustmers at higher price rates. For example, Former captain of indian national crircket team MS DOHNI was a brand ambessedor of Amarplai group, which is banned by supreme court in a fraud case.
At last, it can be summed up that no doubt both sides have convincing arguments, but i strongly deem that advantages are out weight the disadvantages of sponership.of sport by companies.
- In towns and cities, large shopping malls replace the small local shops. 62
- Demand of food is increasing worldwide. What cause of this? What measures can take to meet this demand. 78
- Reasons to attend college 56
- two pie charts compare the percentage wise share in Turkish economy by various sector's in 2000 and 2016 78
- The only way to solve incresing crime rate of young offenders is to teach parents better parenting skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a drawback' or simply 'drawbacks'?
Suggestion: a drawback; drawbacks
... dim view of it and observe that it has a drawbacks. The upcoimg paragraph will analyse the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a benefit' or simply 'benefits'?
Suggestion: a benefit; benefits
...at sports sponsership by companies have a benefits. In the first place, it is true tgat co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nies and because of this league standard ofcricket games rise to upper level. N...
^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'weighted'.
Suggestion: weighted
...i strongly deem that advantages are out weight the disadvantages of sponership.of spor...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, nevertheless, so, for example, no doubt, it is true, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17625899281 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90512113216 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604316546763 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4237107264 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.916666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312878311816 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107457891776 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841154822623 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165368938098 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122146136883 0.056905535591 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.