People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Decisions are the result of the human psychological thinking based on various factors which affect this very decision-making ability. Many a time this ability is influenced by an emotion which thwarts the process of making a decision based on pure logic and practicality. I comply to the idea that people who make decisions based on emotions are poor decision makers to some extent.
Firstly, to cite an example which supports the above assertion, After the successful mission of the Apollo 11 Space program by the United States of America, USSR also tried to reach the Moon. This decision by the USSR was taken very quickly and also was taken while being emotionally influenced. The result of this decision as we all know unfortunately, was not in the favor of Russia. The mission failed miserably and was also a major catalyst in the disintegration of the USSR. Therefore, in this case USSR proved to be a poor decision maker due to the emotional influence.
Secondly, our everyday decisions are also sometimes influenced by emotions. For example, in today’s world technology is developing at a rapid pace and thus this effect of technology is observed in the cellphone industry. A person buys a cellphone and on the next day, a new cellphone with new and advanced features comes in the market. This in turn motivates the person to buy that new and expensive cellphone just because he was emotionally motivated to make this decision. After buying the new cellphone, he will justify it by telling everyone about its cutting-edge features. But at the end of the day, he will realize that his old cellphone was as good as his newer one.
On the other hand, Decisions based on emotions can sometimes lead to a successful outcome and with logical reasoning. To give an example, A person who is overweight can get motivated by the emotions and willpower to lose their weight by joining the gym or practicing a healthy diet. These decisions are also proved many a time logical afterwards. Thus, the assertion that people who make decision emotionally and justify them with logic afterwards prove to be invalid in above scenario.
Hence, the statement that people who make decisions based on emotions and justify those with logic afterwards are poor decision makers is rather ambiguous. It can depend from person to person and thus we cannot firmly say that such people are poor decision makers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | lcosenza | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | mrigimunjal | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | likhithae | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 312, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'features'' or 'feature's'?
Suggestion: features'; feature's
..., a new cellphone with new and advanced features comes in the market. This in turn motiv...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2014.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98514851485 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76930865637 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487623762376 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0039916785 60.3974514979 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.7 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.535738782003 0.243740707755 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181670713243 0.0831039109588 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.190568914133 0.0758088955206 251% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.359457697223 0.150359130593 239% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.213331018363 0.0667264976115 320% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.