Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
People all over the world have unique characteristics that shape them into who they are. As for leaders, these characteristics matter even more, because, in their hands, hold the power and ability to affect their respective followers. Although it is important for a leader to maintain the respect of his or her peers, it is more important for the leader to have sound moral judgement and a good sense of right and wrong because of how easily swayed groups of individuals may be, and how the most important decisions do not necessarily lead to the ones that could gain the most respect from peers.
In almost every country in Africa, the LGBTQ community is looked down upon. So much so that many countries have criminalized anyone that may be affiliated with the community, with up to 14 years in prison to life imprisonment as possible sentences. Due to reasons such as tradition, culture and religious beliefs, many countries in Africa hold so dearly to anti-LGBTQ laws, and also vilify and discourage their neighborhood African countries to grant the LGBTQ community their rightful laws. South Africa, on the other hand, is one of the only two nations in Africa to have LGBTQ rights. It is the only nation, irrespective of what the political heads of other African nation states may say and do, that has granted the LGBTQ community their rights to freedom despite their sexual orientation, because the South African democratic government know that it is wrong to deny anyone their freedom because of their sexual orientation.
Moreover, take the story of Martin Luther King for example. MLK grew up in a community where the black was the lowest caste in the society. The black man was treated very poorly and were not afforded basic rights. However, in that time, that was the way the world was. It was normal that black people were second class citizens, and it was almost impossible to move up the social ladder as a black person. People, both black and white, wanted to keep things the way they were as to not cause any form of commotion or disruption in the society. During the Civil Rights movement, many people, including his family advised him to stop his protests. In his memoir, he mentioned that people would frequently ask him why he did what he did, and how he would lose surely lose the respect of his esteemed white peers. MLK, however, knew in his heart that he had to fight for what was right despite what people around him may say. He used his sound moral judgement to change the constitution of America, which surpassed the importance of maintaining the respect of his peers.
A leader's ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers is important. Without respect from peers, it may be difficult for the people you are leading to follow you. However, peers may change from time to time, and opinions of those peers may change as well, but sound moral judgement is usually unwavering and consistent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | arpit6798 | 79 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 529, Rule ID: ONE_OF_THE_ONLY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one of the few'?
Suggestion: one of the few
...ws. South Africa, on the other hand, is one of the only two nations in Africa to have LGBTQ rig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 3, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ining the respect of his peers. A leaders ability to maintain the respect of his ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, well, as for, as to, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2432.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 507.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79684418146 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74517233601 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51940096821 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495069033531 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.0458087853 60.3974514979 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.80952381 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210646882397 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630767883101 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111560830378 0.0758088955206 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14909453888 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116519494767 0.0667264976115 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.