The line graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992.
The line graph indicates the percentage of individuals that listen to radio and watching TV during a period of 24-hours between October and December 1992 in the UK.
Overall, people mostly listen to radio in the morning and the number of audiences gradually decreases as just a tiny group of people turn their radio on. In contrast, individuals are likely to watch TV at night as it is not their main entertainment during a day. Generally, it seems that people find the TV more enjoyable than radio in the UK, based on the information provided by graph.
Regarding the graph, it is evident that between 1 am and 6 am the percentage of people listen to radio is steady, less than 5%. However, there is a sharp increase between 6 am and 9 am as it peaks to 25% around 9 am. Following hours experience a drop, however it sometimes fluctuates in some special hours.
Moreover, less than 10 % of individuals watch TV from the midnight to 11 am. There is a little ascend in percentage of watching by 10% between 11 and 13 pm and a dramatic increase is seen until 9 pm at 45%. Afterward, It plunges as just 15% of the UK residence watch the TV. Surprisingly, 15% of people around 13 pm equally watch TV and listen to radio at the same time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Bich Thuy Pham | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Hussey | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | bishalpokharel1211 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | bishalpokharel1211 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | farzad.rahmati_1989 | 73 | view |
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 73
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 61
- The following charts represent the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. 89
- Some people believe that competitive sports, both team and individual, have no place in the school curriculum. How far do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, regarding, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47136563877 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69395019471 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515418502203 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7885107365 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2727272727 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133022964326 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517918882137 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577461897559 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097086049218 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668518976434 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.