Sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagree
with the following statement? The group will be helped more by person who will be
willing to do what other group members want than by person who often strongly
insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants
to do.
Currently, there is a widespread believe that group member should absolutely obey the order of group. From my perspective, however, I believe that people who always insists the different things should be done in a way is as important as the person who entirely follow group.
First, the people always querying group are able to promote group’s plan. Every action base on a complete and effective plan. It is difficult to make a perfect plan by a certain person. People usually forget some factors which may dispute progress of plan. Thus, others’ suggestions and opinions are obviously important, under this circumstance. Meanwhile, the people who always persist themselves’ opinions can play a critical role. If they insist their plan, they absolutely believe that there are some disadvantages for group’s plan or some advantages for his or her plan. Then, learning from others ‘s strong opinions to offset one’s weakness is a good way to promote final plan. Thereby, unremitting people are important for group.
Second, the people following group is essential condition to complete some goal. Single person is limited. Thereby people need to cluster to accomplish some huge project. It is important to make a material and effective plan, and also, need to find some people who entirely follow group and no suspect. This point can be perfect illustrated with a example about Napoleon. After Napoleon graduated from military academy, he got a opportunity to command a troop in battle of Toulon. When Napoleon arrived frontline, he immediately asked soldiers to find one hundred canons in several days. Although this order is ridiculous, his soldiers totally trusted him and tried their best to find and fix cannon. As result, his soldiers completed this impossible assignment. Meantime, those cannons play a very important role in battle of Tounlon. That’s why people who willing to do the task assigned by group is important.
On balance, people have different opinion or some suggestion of group plan could promote the final plan, but the final plan could not be achieved, when no one willing to do. Thus, two types group members are both important.
- abcd 3
- There are three ways that government used to protect environment.1.Enforce the law about pollution2.Develop friendly-environment resource3.Protect forest and animal. 70
- Sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagreewith the following statement? The group will be helped more by person who will bewilling to do what other group members want than b 70
- Some believe that one should spend more time being far awayfrom the people we care about, because it is necessary for people to understand the importance of relationship of people we care about, while o 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
Currently, there is a widespread believe that group member should absolutely obe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s point can be perfect illustrated with a example about Napoleon. After Napoleon ...
^
Line 5, column 428, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...graduated from military academy, he got a opportunity to command a troop in battl...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24786324786 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78307187813 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547008547009 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2446864219 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.75 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.625 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.70833333333 5.45110844103 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224704567863 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0722688386692 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080456867482 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167650655129 0.150856017488 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487562902481 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.