Public persons in Media
The last century has been conceived to be the Era of changes happened in all spheres of our lives – from the daily routines to the considerable breakthroughs in bio- and IT-technologies, engineering, communications and etc. The internet, Television, Radio can be pointed out to be new ways of communications that are owned nowadays thanks to mentioned above progress. Never in the recorded history has the humanity has as unprecedented opportunities to be in touch with the rest of the world as it has today. Indeed, nowadays not only are there used over thousands and thousands of years chances to interact with indigenous folks from our villages, but as well considerable and even in past unfeasible, unattainable opportunities to be in touch with people over the world. Having comprehended these facts, one might ask whether these distance people have considerable impact on us or not?
The briefest reflection on the current daily lifestyle easily reveals that there is a blizzard of areas which are inured to connection with the world. Whether it is checking the news or preparing an essay or even just reading a book, we can be estimated to be under the effect of it, to be influenced by people which wrote this information. Presumably, the influencers play a crucial role in this process, so do the themes rose by them – from the economic situations in the emerging/developing, developed countries and the global warming, negative influence of our generation on the Earth to the not quite clever items in sexual spheres, damaging ways of behavior among adolescence. It is high time to push the prominent and urgent themes further and to get rid of the rest ones, that are unnecessary.
To illustrate the idea and to conceive it better, consider the last meeting of the world leaders that took the place in the USA approximately one month ago. The most controversial and contentious media person of it has become Greta Tunderg, the 16-years old girl from the European union, who rose the question of precarious, hazard lifestyle of the humankind and as well the reluctant actions of the developed countries to solve this issue. One might argue that this fledgling is too aggressive and young, as well has not have yet the essential experience in the handling the global processes and also there are the other more talented and high-gifted persons whose achievements are deserved to be shedded by harsh light of the media. However, having analyzed the effects created by Greta, it can be promptly realized that while the target here, in Media sphere, to apprise us with details of solving problems is huge and so is the aim to create awareness of the problem and make this irritating sense of dissatisfaction and pendency. Greta did it perfectly.
So, in the conclusion, it can be said that were it not for the Media, it could be estimated to be too onerous to connect with each other, to raise awareness among the tremendous part of the population concerning different issues and to solve the most urgent questions. There is no a need to retreat the Luddite attitude to Media persons and issues rose by them, rather than to make a positive posture to it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-14 | KarinaShine | 67 | view |
- Dating 87
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free. 66
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species despite the expense to humans in effort time and financial well being Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money an 70
- overconsumption in the modern world due to noticeable breakthroughs in machine learning, chemical and medical industries etc. 78
- Animals debate 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...chnologies, engineering, communications and etc. The internet, Television, Radio can be ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 369, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Never' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...ays thanks to mentioned above progress. Never in the recorded history has the humanit...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'betters', 'wells'?
Suggestion: betters; wells
... illustrate the idea and to conceive it better, consider the last meeting of the world...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 523, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...o aggressive and young, as well has not have yet the essential experience in the han...
^^^^
Line 7, column 280, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ve the most urgent questions. There is no a need to retreat the Luddite attitude ...
^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... need to retreat the Luddite attitude to Media persons and issues rose by them, r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 7.48453608247 374% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 5.05154639175 455% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.03092783505 363% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 32.9175257732 106% => OK
Preposition: 87.0 26.3917525773 330% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 3.85567010309 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2637.0 937.175257732 281% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 537.0 206.0 261% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91061452514 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81386128306 3.78020617076 127% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95569270173 2.54303337028 116% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 127.690721649 220% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523277467412 0.622605031667 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 837.0 290.88556701 288% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6804123711 126% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 16.3608247423 202% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.8658638308 44.8134815571 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.8125 76.5299724578 215% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 33.5625 16.8248392259 199% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 4.34317383033 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 2.54639175258 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104438638692 0.216113520407 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345523038356 0.0766984524023 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586094546855 0.0603063233224 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073865452992 0.12726935374 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738911618789 0.0580467560999 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 8.37731958763 221% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 70.7449484536 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 7.45979381443 217% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 8.71597938144 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 7.59969072165 127% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 41.2886597938 361% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 8.62886597938 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 8.54432989691 178% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.