At present, the media affects people’s lives significantly.
What impact does this have on society? Is it a negative or positive
development?
Television and print media are creating a real effect on the lives of the public. This is resulting in biased thinking among society, and it is undoubtedly an unfavorable development, due to the overall negativity which it is creating among people.
To embark upon, people follow the current affairs regularly, and many of their decisions are influenced by these news. In other words, they believe everything which they read in newspapers and watch on television. Even they believe the fake news which is only based on rumors to misguide public at large. To illustrate, there was news on some television channels that Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal said against the people who are coming to Delhi from Bihar for medical treatments. Later on, it was found that media has created a fabricated version by editing the original video and he actually said something else. Nevertheless, it even created the false image of Mr. Kejriwal in my mind also at first but later on, I understood.
The above-mentioned scenario is adverse because news agencies generally focus on destructive elements that are poising the minds of people and affecting their lives severely. Many fake news about the inter-community violence flashes daily all over the channels, which are spreading communal hatred among the communities. Not only that, how these houses spread news is also provocative. There was news, for instance, in many newspapers that a Hindu man was killed by Muslims in Bihar. The said killing was due to a personal dispute, not any religious matter. However, media spread that as communal violence which resulted in disturbance and conflicts among both religions all over the country. Therefore, it can be said this strong influence of media could divide and damage society.
In conclusion, the media affect the thinking of the public greatly, and it is detrimental to society as it is raising communism and causing disturbance among people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-14 | Karanawal15@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | Priyan ka | 61 | view |
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, jobsatisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing.What are the factors that contribute to job satisfaction?How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 73
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status andmaterial possessions. Old fashioned values such as honour, kindness, and trust nolonger seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a homewith other old people where there are nurses to look after them.Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or thefamily? 73
- At present, the media affects people’s lives significantly.What impact does this have on society? Is it a negative or positivedevelopment? 78
- Modern children are suffering from the diseases that were once considered to be meant for adults only. Obesity is a major disease prevalent among children. What are its causes and what solutions canbe offered? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this news' or 'these newses'?
Suggestion: this news; these newses
...ny of their decisions are influenced by these news. In other words, they believe everythin...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun news seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much fake news', 'a good deal of fake news'.
Suggestion: Much fake news; A good deal of fake news
...ple and affecting their lives severely. Many fake news about the inter-community violence flas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, nevertheless, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18095238095 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78235450628 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9653025654 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6875 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125670927872 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040568386495 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374125726492 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871259987106 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217963905517 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.