In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
In todays world, with the advent of technology and growing population, information exchange has become super easy. Where earlier people were used to news passing from person to person, these days, dailies, television, radio have turned out to be improved ways of information transmission. But the increasing number of these sources have inundated our society with perplexing thoughts and opinions. With this large coverage by media, it is tough for any man or woman to be considered as a hero, as even if the media portrays him or her as such, the opinions of the thousands of viewers will differ a lot.
The irony is that these days people show magnanimity towards the society to get famous and not the other way around. The whole agenda of majority NGOs and public servants is to become popular and gain money. Media has made it easy for people to achieve this incentive. YouTube can be considered as an example. Anyone who gets trending, irrespective of the deeds they perform are at a monetary advantage. It is impractical in this environment for anyone to retain the reputation of a hero for more than a week.
Talking about monetary incentives, the whole business of media has been diverted towards money-making. Open a newspaper and more than news you will find a plethora of pamphlets of fashionable clothing brands and lucrative sales and discounts at the nearest malls. Anything or anyone that has the potential to go viral is considered as top news. Obviously when there is news about a new saint in town or a celebrity conflict at a big show, not many people would be interested to know about that benevolent person who has started an initiative to feed impecunious kids of his city.
As every coin has two sides, the same media which can rise a person’s renown can degrade him in the very next second. A recent case which happened in the city of Delhi can be taken as a perfect example of this. A man who was just trying to stop a feral girl from breaking the traffic law was deemed as an abuser by the girl. This image was amplified by the media. Any news of abuse is likely to gain much attention as well as wrath of the public due to serious abuse cases in the city in the past. This led the poor man to lose his job and soil his reputation in city badly.
Thus, even though it is hard for the whole public to form a unified opinion about someone, there is still a chance for a person to be regarded as hero by them, ephemerally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | AC1990 | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | joonho | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | stevewang1007 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | Grainwheat | 66 | view |
- The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens. 66
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition. 58
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States This change however has had little impact 72
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. 58
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing."Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric, we discontinued 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he other way around. The whole agenda of majority NGOs and public servants is to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, still, thus, well, as to, talking about, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2033.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60997732426 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56931209816 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0398976816 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8095238095 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187646259716 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533057490171 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669558293959 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102540843442 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464129647492 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.