An increasing number of schools provide tablets and laptop computers for students to use in school, replacing books and other printed materials like exams and assignments.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend?
Computers and tablets have a wide range of features which will enable students to solve difficult problems with ease in a short span of time. Computers and tablets with internet access will give students vast opportunities to help in doing research, and showcase their talent on a global scale. It can be environment-friendly also, since we are replacing books and other printed materials. However, with all the advancements in social networking apps, and games, it is easy for students to get lost in this labyrinth, which will affect their grades.
For instance, papers are usually manufactured using trees. A large number of trees are being cut down to manufacture papers, which will have an impact on the ecosystem. We should try to minimize deforestation and promote aforestation. By using computers and tablets to carry out exams, assignments and other things, we can reduce the amount of deforestation. Also, with all the new learning apps like Byju's application, students will get to see the videos showing practical applications of what they are learning. It will help in understanding the topic better which is not possible with just some books and printed material.
However, students often get addicted to online games like PUBG, playing it all the time which may result in improper preparation for exams thereby affecting their grades. With exposure to many social applications that allow users to create anonymous accounts, students often get encouraged at bullying others, which should not be tolerated. So these things should be under control, then only students will be able to achieve their goal.
Looking at computers and tablets display can cause eye damage to students. The ultraviolet rays emerging from the screen are very harmful to human eyes. Prolonged exposure may cause permanent damage to eyes in long term. Prevention is better than cure, so we should minimize using laptops and tablets as much as possible. And allow students to use books and other printed materials.
Even though schools aims to provide top class education by relacing books and other study materials with computers and laptops which will enhance the students learning experience and help them in being more productive, one should also consider the adverse effect it has on students. If such negative aspects can be controlled by careful management, then only using such new technology will be fruitful.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-15 | Mimibae 985 | 73 | view |
2020-01-15 | Mimibae 985 | 67 | view |
2019-12-12 | drake | 73 | view |
2019-12-10 | PHAM ANH THU | 78 | view |
2019-12-07 | prachirai | 73 | view |
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership. 16
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs. 50
- Eventually, technology will solve the most important environmental problems the world faces today. 73
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers. 58
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
...s are usually manufactured using trees. A large number of trees are being cut down to manufacture...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 169, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to experience'
Suggestion: to experience
...hich will enhance the students learning experience and help them in being more productive,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, may, so, then, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2036.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26098191214 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77943703824 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560723514212 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1636607228 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.8 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244919287196 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727243037182 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587115669868 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13459986929 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326968891961 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.