Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Each and every animal on earth has as much right to be here as you and me. While some people believe that the society should make efforts to save endangered species only when humans are responsible for it, I disagree with this point, because the most of the others factors that are responsible for the extinction of species, for instance, global warming, the humans are indirectly responsible for it. Therefore, societies should make efforts to save them either if humans are responsible or not.
First and foremost, deforestation and over-harvesting are the fundamental reasons for the extinction of the species, and for this humans are responsible. From 1800 to 2018 the human population has increased from 1 billion to 7.616 billion roughly, and due to the tremendous increase in population, industrialization has grown rapidly. This further leads to deforestation, because of which animals have lost there living areas in the forest. Further the over-harvesting is the main problem because people are harvesting more of ivory of the elephant, fur and organs of the tiger, etc. Therefore societies should carry out policies for these reasons to save the endangered species.
Additionally, environmental factors, such as, global warming, which is responsible for the extinction of species, but again humans are responsible for it indirectly. As industrialization has grown rapidly the emission of carbon dioxide and other air pollutant substances causes the more increase in global warming. Moreover, due to its hazardous effects, the species can not sustain in such a hot temperature and again water shortage also occurs because of this. Similarly, due to global warming, the glaciers are melting very rapidly, therefore species in the polar region get affected. Hence to keep up ecosystem balance, societies should take further steps to prevent the consequences of these effects.
However, some people believe that taking further steps to prevent the extinction of endangered species will cost very high because it requires a lot of government budgets and human resources. But if we take the preventive measures today, we will face fewer problems further, because one species depend on another species for forage. Thus to keep up the natural life cycle, societies should invest to save endangered species even if humans are not responsible for it.
In conclusion, according me when we lose an animal species to extinction, we lose part of our family. Hence I disagree with this topic to save only endangered species if the reason behind their extinction is human activities. Rather we should save their species even if we are not responsible for that to prevent an imbalance of our ecosystem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Caveira meyona | 62 | view |
- "Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates, for the past several decades, food-processing companies have also been adding salicylates to f 66
- Sea otters. 73
- settlement of the Chaco Canyon 56
- Reading Passage: Although Johannes Vermeer is famous for his masterpiece "Girl with a Pearl Earring", not much is known about who modeled for the painting. The curiosity aroused by the mystery brought about several theories about the true i 83
- The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine."Two studies of amphibians in Xanadu National Park confirm a significant decline in the numbers of amphibians. In 1975 there were seven species of amphibians in the park, and there 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... the extinction of the species, and for this humans are responsible. From 1800 to 20...
^^^^
Line 9, column 589, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ecies in the polar region get affected. Hence to keep up ecosystem balance, societies...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 334, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s depend on another species for forage. Thus to keep up the natural life cycle, soci...
^^^^
Line 17, column 103, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...extinction, we lose part of our family. Hence I disagree with this topic to save only...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 227, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...d their extinction is human activities. Rather we should save their species even if we...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2286.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30394431555 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94593045618 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487238979118 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.426230985 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.315789474 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6842105263 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47368421053 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348497702662 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113349747972 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878799268477 0.0758088955206 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206877920044 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740486682114 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.