It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
The new inventions have made it feasible for humans to reach untouched nature to conduct research or simply enjoy the scenery. Although these unseen places present plenty of opportunities both to science and tourism industry, the purity of them gets endangered as soon as men set their foot on those lands.
On the one hand, a lot of scientific questions can be answered by examining these areas. They are so many facts hidden in their soil, such as buried fossils of instinct animals. Reaching those lands can help researcher to understand the revolution in a better light. Besides, duo to their unique climates, scientist might gain special knowledge which they had not found in other places. There is also the possible impact of reaching off the beaten path places on tourism industry. It attracts undoubtedly lots of attention since people like to be the first one who travels to those lands before it gets destroyed by the humankind. Therefore, it will bring large amount of revenue for travel agencies which offer such destinations.
On the other hand, whenever human goes destruction follows as it has happened to other natural sites in the past. People change the environment by abandoning their trash, which most of the are non-recyclable, in the nature, cutting the trees or worst of all threatening the species by haunting them. In addition, humans need to build constructions such as hotels or research labs if they want to stay there for a long time. These new building change the ecosystem dramatically and damage the purity of the environment. For example, construction might scare animals to roam freely and prevent them from accessing their food supplies and thus put them in the risk of dying out.
In conclusion, although accessing remote natural places can solve many researchers’ problems and uncover valuable information, in my opinion its disadvantages outweigh its benefits. Hence, it is better to preserve those places by limiting people access to them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-17 | b.yousefi | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | astrlw@hotmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | bhatvishal@ | 73 | view |
- On a recent holiday you lost a valuable item Fortunately you have travel insurance to cover the cost of anything lost Write a letter to the manager of your insurance company In your letter Describe the item you lost explain how you lost it tell the insura 69
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both these views 84
- Some people think that school should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- tourists and not local people are visiting museums and historical sites. why is it so and what are the ways to attract local people? 84
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n as men set their foot on those lands. On the one hand, a lot of scientific que...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 732, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...agencies which offer such destinations. On the other hand, whenever human goes d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1677.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79892456101 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0264117524 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.8125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125395490538 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364692952099 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034558396319 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0696016132991 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185012199709 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.