For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Education plays an important role on children's personal development. Some people argue that teachers have more impact on pupils intellectual and social progress than their parents. Although, students learn critical skills from their instructors, I do believe it is family that shapes a person.
Firstly, scholars spend most of their time at home where they are under the direct influence of their guardians. One teacher is assigned to a group of students, from 10 to 40, while usually each child is under the care of two parents whom have to divide their attention between possibly one or two offspring. Therefore, parents can spend more quality time with their children and guide them. In addition, teacher do not generally devote their life to the success of their students whereas parents make it their mission to pave the path for their children achievement whether it is via tutoring their children or reprimanding them for their destructive actions. Hence, as children spend more time in the company of their parents, it is more likely that the parents have the most productive effect on their children.
Secondly, children like to impress their parents and they often thrive to become someone like them. It is very common that a youngster with stable and healthy family often choose their mother or father as their role model. This simply means that they try their best to observe that person's behavior and try their best to imitate them. Undoubtedly, repeating an action makes it a habit over time and instill it in the child personality; it is especially true about social behaviors. For example, children with extrovert parents turn out to be easygoing as well since they witnessed their parents warm and welcoming attitude towards foreigners while growing up. Moreover, children seek their parent’s approval and the easiest way to get that is through following their parents steps and be the person their parents envisioned them to be.
In conclusion, although school and more specifically teachers provide scientific and moral lessons for children, parents have a stronger impact on their children intellectual and social development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-28 | b.yousefi | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | adeagboridwan | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | adeagboridwan | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-13 | kaur_deep | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-07 | VishvAdthakkar | 61 | view |
- tourists and not local people are visiting museums and historical sites. why is it so and what are the ways to attract local people? 84
- People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out. What are the causes? What solutions can you suggest? 89
- Some people believe that men and women are equal so women should be able to do any job they want and others feels that men and women are not equal and therefore there are certain jobs which are not suitable for women What is your opinion 79
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both these views 84
- Recently your employer offered some employees to do some work directly from home. Write a letter to your manger requesting the same arrangement. You should say– Why do you want to work from home?– Why would it be beneficial for the company and yoursel 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 283, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...hat they try their best to observe that persons behavior and try their best to imitate ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 24.0651302605 208% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24495677233 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62994471873 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550432276657 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4282239847 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.467389704859 0.244688304435 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183028016193 0.084324248473 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107788730539 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.318874976524 0.151304729494 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695520752212 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.