Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Essay topics:

Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Recently, the phenomenon of using public transportation and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedure is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am Inclined to believe that the air pollution can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a general standpoint, improving public facilities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both the forbidden car law and using cycling apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of a public arena, the protection of environment might increase the consequence of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes has correlated negatively with global warming. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of climate change far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential of implication.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-18 smb.arami 77 view
2019-10-18 smb.arami 77 view
2019-10-18 smb.arami 77 view
2019-08-28 foadihasan 77 view
2019-01-21 neelu sharma 75 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user smb.arami :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66390041494 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25690459763 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680497925311 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6562080538 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.090909091 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0948727279771 0.242375264174 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0300305882333 0.0925447433944 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246324262107 0.071462118173 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0492853715403 0.151781067708 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287183659321 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.16 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.