Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Recently, the idea of banning car due to air pollution has sparked an ongoing controversy, while it is a widely held view that personal cars in cities should be restricted, I will briefly discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
In the realm of environment, one-passenger cars are inextricably tied up with air pollution, in that it would come down to both increasing heat islands in cities and nitrogen smog. As a well-known example, a longitudinal breakthrough study conducted by eminent scientists demonstrated the relationship between model cars and carbon dioxide emission as well as the exponential increase in air temperature. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of decreasing harmful elements is correlated positively with not only inhibiting people from using personal cars but also introduce new laws to prevent such actions.
In the government’s standpoints, without the slightest doubt, intercepting cars used by people attributes to public transportation, which might lead to an increase in taxes and improving infrastructure. A salient example of such attribution is traffic jams and noise pollution, which they were a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take a comfortable lifestyle for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint the inadequate public vehicles in rush hours. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to improving public transportation, pedestrian areas, and cobbled-stone streets. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of municipal policies in reducing car usage.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes, “all’s well that ends well.” After grafting what elaborated above, I firmly believe that cars must be banned immediately in large, crowded cities. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we confer the more research, the further we figure out.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | smb.arami | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | smb.arami | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | smb.arami | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-21 | neelu sharma | 75 | view |
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? 77
- The mass media, including television, radio and newspapers, have great influence in shaping people's ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (Give reasons and relevant examples to support your answer.) 77
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 77
- The importance of travel seems to be over rated. Brilliant scholars locked themselves at home. Travel is important for education. To what extent to you agree or disagree. 88
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 305.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67213114754 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31135529729 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 139.433497537 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67868852459 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.5101243236 50.4703680194 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.166666667 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.25397266985 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139567607178 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0402791226552 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340697965607 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0791275939477 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185506916448 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 55.0591133005 207% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.94827586207 201% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.