tpo 35 smart cars
The reading states that smart cars have many benefits. However, the professor disagrees and mentioned that even if smart cars could meet technological expectations, it is not clear to produce benefits.
First, the author claims that smart cars could reduce the number of car accidents. One the other hand, the professor opposed this and stated that smart cars allow cars to be more tightly packed, so accidents would pile up and be worse than accidents today. Consequently, smart cars could not save lives or reduce injuries.
Second, the reading points that highly speed cars are could reduce commute time. On the contrary, the lecturer countered this and explained smart cars could encourage people to drive because they expect it easier. Increasing the number of drivers could create traffic congestion and does not allow decreasing in commute time. As a result, people could not take advantage of high-speed cars.
Finally, the author said that smart cars are cost-effective. In contrast, the lecturer contradicted this and mentioned that global position techniques are expensive and need other costly techniques, such as sensors, which keep cars in a specific distance from other cars. in addition to that, repairing smart cars is more expensive than conventional cars. Therefore, this could create new expenses that could offset saving.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | nagy | 76 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | Christine hanna | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | Christine hanna | 71 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 273, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...in a specific distance from other cars. in addition to that, repairing smart cars ...
^^
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsive than conventional cars. Therefore, this could create new expenses that coul...
^^^
Line 7, column 427, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... new expenses that could offset saving.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, in addition, in contrast, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 30.3222958057 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36320754717 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6244394543 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 334.8 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0975319395 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4615384615 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3076923077 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294898777752 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138269628528 0.0996497079465 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957626257704 0.0662205650399 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207430240703 0.162205337803 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721475804552 0.0443174109184 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.