The bar chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activities in 2010.
The bar graph depicts information about the percent of Australian population who took part in physical activities frequently in the year 2010. The population was divided into 6 age groups and each age categories were further divided into male and female for illustrating the result.
Overall, it is evident from the graph that female who were involved in physical activities were higher in proportion compared to male counterparts in almost every age group (with exception of age group between 15 to 24 years) of the demographics.
In summary, the highest percentage gap between two genders was seen in age group between 35 to 44 years: physical activities percent for male was about 40% while for female the figure was 52.5%. However, the percent of the male and female participants of physical activities for most aged group (65 and older group) was subtle around 46 to 47%. For rest of the aged group the difference between the percent involvements in physical activities were found to be in medium range around 6 to 10% difference.
While, in most of the aged group, female dominated the findings; however, for youngest population of Australia, proportion of male population was shown to have undertaken the activities more than that of female population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | DAMIN | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | bishalpokharel1211 | 67 | view |
| 2019-02-20 | lusinemamikonyan | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992. 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activities in 2010. 67
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. 78
- forate rle to recce 11
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the usa since 1980 with projections until 2030. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1067.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15458937198 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82023010928 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492753623188 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.1444212409 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.428571429 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258999131531 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145977039177 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522579362826 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166765206437 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534916411496 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.