People naturally resist making changes in their lives.
What kinds of problems can this cause? What solutions can you suggest?
It is undeniable that people generally prevent any change in their lives. This results in their hindered career growth and raises their level of frustration. It can be resolved by creating awareness and arranging change management training by organizations and people also need to change their regressive thinking.
To embark upon, people usually do not prefer any alteration in their routine life, which mostly results in the loss of opportunities. Consequently, their chances to get success reduced and most of the time they have to stay at the same level. Moreover, this situation later makes them extremely dissatisfied and raises their stress level. Even in many cases, their breakdown leads to serious mental diseases such as anxiety and depression. In India, for instance, around 24 % of corporate employees stay at the same level for more than eight years just because of their habit of saying no to change. This is a major cause of the increased number of mental illnesses in the country.
To tackle the problems, employers should launch an awareness campaign and conduct training sessions among their workforce about the benefits of change in their lives and dire consequences if they do not accept the same. This could shed some light on the issue and allow them to be more open and attentive about it. Companies in Japan, to illustrate, launched a similar initiative, which results in immense growth in the satisfaction level of their employees. Furthermore, people need to understand that modification for the betterment of life is vital and beneficial and they should adopt it whenever there is a requirement in order to improve. This thinking will automatically take all their worries and upgrade their life.
In conclusion, the tendency to resist alteration is very common among people, and it is affecting their prospects to grow and increase dissatisfaction among them. It can be handled if employers aware and train their staff about the skills of embracing changes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-20 | Karanawal15@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-20 | Karanawal15@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | Priyan ka | 67 | view |
| 2019-04-11 | prasanta | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-10 | prasanta | 73 | view |
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status andmaterial possessions. Old fashioned values such as honour, kindness, and trust nolonger seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 61
- Life was better when technology was simpler. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 67
- People naturally resist making changes in their lives.What kinds of problems can this cause? What solutions can you suggest? 78
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a homewith other old people where there are nurses to look after them.Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or thefamily? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19254658385 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81456332648 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580745341615 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0720642915 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21447021703 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075667747898 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501105627616 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142788979221 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624458340719 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.