Some think the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them based on
how much they produce and sell.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Encouraging staff and employees in each job is a vital strategy for each manager or organization, but it should be considered that the occupation’s existence are different. Hence I believe, choosing the rate of selling produce by some persons as a major criteria of encouragement is detrimental.
Firstly, jobs have various essence and existence. For example facilities jobs or industrial jobs completely are different which is obvious in factories the employees produce some specific products in comparison to some jobs such as teachers and doctors which provide some services. As a result, this trend could not be appropriate for all jobs.
Secondly, this way of encouragement can damage the quality of firms or organizations. Actually this way could discourage other staff and employees since they probably have not the ability to compete with others and consequently they would be probably be stopped in their positions. For instance when individuals after numerous endeavour don’t reach to the high so he would be demoralized.
By contrast, some other people argue that motivate people by this trend would evolve the abilities of individuals such as creativity. They try to acquire more money so they try to show their capabilities and compete with others. However, I believe this way should be completed by adding some other criteria such as productivity, management, team working and so on and this one criteria could not be helpful.
In conclusion, I believe there should be more indices to the evaluation of people for getting money to them and determination of salary based on produce and selling products could not cover all jobs and is inefficient.
- Some think the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them based on how much they produce and sell To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 62
- Some people argue that it is not wise for and industries to replace its experienced but old workers with new and young yet inexperienced individuals. To what extend do you agree or dis agree? 67
- Young students should be taught to use computers in primary school. How far do you agree or disagree with statement? 73
- Young students should be taught to use computers in primary school. How far do you agree or disagree with statement? 73
- More and more wild animals are on the verge of extinction and others are on the endangered list. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to solve this problem? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...upation's existence are different. Hence I believe, choosing the rate of selling...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
...ling produce by some persons as a major criteria of encouragement is detrimental. Firs...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one criterion', 'a criterion', or simply 'criteria'?
Suggestion: one criterion; a criterion; criteria
...gement, team working and so on and this one criteria could not be helpful. In conclusion, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not cover all jobs and is inefficient.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1415.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29962546816 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07775395388 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535580524345 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3601723971 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.916666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1666666667 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198417691245 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074792116536 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04755658503 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111691270449 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358475990439 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.