Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governmets must invest this money in public services instead.
It is argued that the authorities squander resources to the field of arts, while some say that it would be better investing money in social services. Although both of them bring benefits to residents in some way, I completely support that public service should be high on the agenda.
On the one hand, there is a variety of reasons why investing in the arts gains certain benefits. Firstly, it plays a vital role in the spiritual life of people. Living under much pressure, forms of entertainment such as movies, music, which bring a great sense of satisfied to the people after long hard-working days so that the government funds to the art fields that mean is overcoming the high of a level of stress of people. Secondly, funds for entertainment also creates more jobs for the locality and gains more money from taxes, which generate stable cash flow for the economy.
On the one hand, despite numerous benefits of allocating for the arts, the social services should be top government priorities. In terms of education, which is the most important in boosting the development of the country. For instance, after world war II, Japan, becoming a powerful country thanks to the policies focusing on the education system. Moreover, public funds to the infrastructure facilities, which is an indispensable part of the strategy of economic development, which facilitates another field, tourism, transportation, namely.
In conclusion, the authorities should focus on a certain field depending on the economic state of each country. However, I still hold to my view above
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-26 | Phạm Phú Trường | 61 | view |
- The diagrams show total global population between 1900 and 2000, and its proportions according to region. 73
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion 78
- Task 2: Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old house in the local areas, while other think that people should have freedom to build house of their own styles. discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- The consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat 78
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean '(thanks)'?
Suggestion: (thanks)
... II, Japan, becoming a powerful country thanks to the policies focusing on the educati...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1315.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09689922481 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89011128238 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589147286822 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4852638122 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.583333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150219684224 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446553300822 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500116219354 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0799119628827 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583527920294 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.