Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well
Nowadays, the innovative and new work is very valuable. Great companies are always seeking for employees who could suggest new and efficient solutions for old and traditional problems. Definitely these people face a lot of challenges and risks even failure. There is a controversial question. Which types of persons are more successful? The take risking people or the people who just do the thing they had already know well. In my own perspective, I think successful people try new things and take risks. The following reasons and examples will elaborate on my opinion.
First idea I want to mention is that trying new things provide people with new opportunity. People could get familiar with many ways and gain a lot of experience. Persons who are looking for novel ways to approach the certain task, enhance their sense of creativity. Therefore, these types of people - who are more experienced and are more creative - are the best options for companies. They hired more than regular people. Even, they might pay higher than people just able to do certain and conventional tasks. For example, my friend always eager to experience new things. Although he just graduated as a civil engineer, he tries new things while studying engineering and learn programming as well as his major courses. He takes risks and implements new programing method in an old conventional steel structure problem. This new method he contrived, makes him get admission from a great university. After that, his multitask ability gives him this chance to be hired at a well-established company.
Another equally point in supporting my stance is that taking risk makes people be able to cope with many types of problems, and also, it increases people ability to decide properly and quickly in case of facing with an unprecedented task. While other people who inclined doing things they knew, are not able to perform successfully in this kind of situation as they are not experienced new things. So, the parameters of being successful are enormous experiences, the ability of decision making in harsh situation and solving problems. These parameters achieved by people who try new things.
To summarize the aforementioned arguments I believe that successful people are trying different and new things and taking risks, because this feature provides many experiences for them and prepares them to deal with unknown problems. They are more creative than other people, so they have more chances to get hired.
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 76
- Movies and televisions have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave 75
- four days working 80
- How to save Torreya tree from extinction in north Florida 85
- it is more important to keep old friends than make new friends 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 415, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
... who just do the thing they had already know well. In my own perspective, I think su...
^^^^
Line 5, column 680, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to program', 'to programme'.
Suggestion: to program; to programme
...gs while studying engineering and learn programming as well as his major courses. He takes ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1000, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be hired at a well-established company. Another equally point in supporting my s...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 317, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...so they have more chances to get hired.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i think, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2091.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 404.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17574257426 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78280217834 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539603960396 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.5864168168 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.64 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.16 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370816844412 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103266488288 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101836890071 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252112196289 0.150856017488 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579775953236 0.0645574589148 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.