The line chart shows the population growth in China, India, and the United States from 1950 to 2000
The line chart demonstrates the population development in China, India, and the United States over a course of 50 years, starting from 1950.
As can be seen from the chart, it is clearly evident that the population growth in all three countries had witnessed an upward tendency. The most dramatic increase was seen in China and India.
To specify, starting at the point of slightly over 700 millions in China and nearly 400 millions in India, the population has dramatically climbed to more than 1200 and just under 1000 millions in these two countries relatively in 2000. However, there was a slight difference between these two countries. If India had a stable growth, there was some minor fluctuations in China. The population of China experienced stable increase from 1950 to 1960 before there was a marginally decrease within 5 years later. In the rest of the period, it went up sharply, reached a peak more than 1200 millions in 2002.
By comparison, there was also a steady growth but the United Statesb’s resident raise very little. It gradually grew up, only fluctuated around 200 millions for 50 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-29 | LinhCandy2801 | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | LinhCandy2801 | 84 | view |
- The line graph showa the population growth in China, India, and the United States from 1950 to 2000 84
- Strick teaching matter from parents leading to radical actions from children can be settled by more flexible technique like bargaining. What is your view point? 56
- The pie chart shows the change of annual spending by local authorities in someland in 1980, 1990and 2000 89
- The line chart shows the population growth in China, India, and the United States from 1950 to 2000 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...amatically climbed to more than 1200 and just under 1000 millions in these two co...
^^
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('marginally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...ease from 1950 to 1960 before there was a marginally decrease within 5 years later. In the rest of th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01063829787 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71530440266 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632978723404 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.1570132044 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365827835469 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132994197771 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136145534949 0.0843802449381 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237565866713 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154554521126 0.0819641961636 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.