The charts below show the percentage of time younger and older people spend on various Internet activities in their free time (excluding email).
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant.
The given charts indicate the proportion of time youngsters and the elderly devote to a wide range of Internet-assisted activities in their spare time. As illustrated by the two charts, the young generation have a tendency to spend the largest amount of their time on social networking whereas making reservations seems to gain the most popularity among older individuals.
Evidently, the 18-26 age group prove their prevailing position over the counterpart as regards to the time allocation for three following activities. To specify, the younger individuals devote 24% of their leisure time to connecting to the Internet, slightly higher than the corresponding figure for the elderly (21%). It is also noticeable that young people’s time dedicated to gaining access to music or films represents a high percentage of 21% as opposed to a 5% lower figure witnessed in that of the 60-70 year olds. People aged from 18 to 26 spend roughly three times more playing games than the older group, which constitute 18% and 5% respectively.
Nevertheless, the proportion of the young’s time devotion surpasses that of the elderly when it comes to the remaining categories. Making booking tends to hold the most attraction to the over 60+ representing 25% which nearly doubles the corresponding figure of youngsters. Next consider the amount of time both groups dedicated to get engaged in conducting heath research, the old are recorded with the number 22%, just a negligible 2% higher than that of the counterpart. Meanwhile, there exists an equal allocation of time for placing online orders in two groups, sharing 12%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-29 | quynhhtrangg2512 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-23 | PTrinh | 67 | view |
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 78
- The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001 and 2007.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The graphs below show four categories of citrus fruits and the top three countries to which these were exported in thousand tonnes in 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- It is shown that meetings, training and discussions now happen online. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh its disadvantages? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given charts indicate the proportion...
^^^
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ost popularity among older individuals. Evidently, the 18-26 age group prove...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h constitute 18% and 5% respectively. Nevertheless, the proportion of the youn...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 260.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25769230769 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04647434211 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 106.607317073 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9450997995 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.7 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232155351475 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920122521789 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536291344161 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165338330587 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061531671415 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 40.7170731707 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.