Human activity has a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both and give your opinion.
The development of many major countries is still evidence of destroying other living organisms. Despite all other livings have equal space to live in the universe, people use it for their growth is unacceptable. Indeed, many resources are already destroyed, but at least should take some steps to preserve the remaining which is not delayed yet. This essay will discuss both views and provide a logical conclusion at the end of the discussion.
On the one hand, the growth of the developed countries is one of the main reasons that has created disturbance for plants and animals. The developing countries equally destroy the natural resources to expand the cities. This is because increasing of population and industries which demand to demolish the forest that severely affects animals. For example, Chennai and Bangalore, so both the places got extended and devastate the forest which was located nearby. Therefore, the increase in population affects both plants and animals.
On the other hand, the negative effect of humans on other living organisms has been controlled. Firstly, the population would be controlled to thwart the depletion of existing resources. Secondly, the government should take some measures to prevent the expansion of the cities. Thirdly, more awareness programs should be organized to the public about the effect of human activity. Consequently, it can still protect the wildlife if the government is being taken proper measures and individuals are advised to follow.
In conclusion, even though, it is found that the resources were exploited, but still, some steps are being taken to protect the available resources for future generations
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-30 | Karthikielts | 56 | view |
2019-08-20 | Aroraprerna | 89 | view |
2019-08-20 | Aroraprerna | 89 | view |
2019-07-02 | Gunjan Pratap | 89 | view |
2019-07-02 | mdsameer | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that women should play an equal role as men in a country’s police force or military force, such as the army, while others think women are not suitable for these kinds of jobs.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Many people buy new phones or laptops to keep up with the latest technology. Is this a good or bad thing? 89
- In today’s competitive world, many families find it necessary for both parents go out to work. While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income, others feel they lack support because of their parents’ absence. 73
- Some people think that video games are advantageous, while others believe video games are harmful tothe people who play them.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction. Do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'evidenced'.
Suggestion: evidenced
...opment of many major countries is still evidence of destroying other living organisms. D...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, third, thirdly, at least, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37642585551 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76192232906 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570342205323 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.9292331745 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.2666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18397177173 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573716967733 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038062009789 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102605007167 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506382972939 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.