The tables beliw shows the distribution of students at UK university by mode of study and gender.
The tabular charts illustrate the men and women proportion enrolled in full-time and part-time postgraduate courses at UK university in four academic sessions from 1996 to 2010.
Overall, it can be incurred that both genders ratio were increase in full-time course whereas, in part-time course it showed fluctuations.
Initially, it is vividly apparent that the students enrolments in full-time courses followed an upward trend for both the genders throughout the given period. In 1996/1997 the numbers of men were more (75,370) as compared to women( 62,344). This showed the inclination during the 2000/01 and 2005/06 in ratio of both gender students it was 87,070 and 85,215 respectively. In 2009/10 the men ratio in full-time course was double as the ratio in 1996/97. The women were in full-time course, 146980.
Secondly, the mens proportion were fluctuate in part-time course it was highest in last years (138505 and 117105) rather than 1996/97 and 2000/01, it was 113961 and 108770. Whereas, the women student were on the peak in 2005/06 it was 172640. In other three academic sessions it was decline near about 10,0000 to 16,0000.
- Children are facing more pressure nowadays from academic social and commercial perspective what are the causes of this pressure and what measures should be taken to reduce this pressure 73
- Many children these days have their own mobile phones what are the advantages and disadvantages of it. 67
- People nowadays work hard to buy more things. This have made our life generally more comfortable but it is a pity many traditional values have been lost on the way to such materialism what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 56
- The graphs below show results of survey of college going boys and girls activities other than academic studies 75
- Computers translate language very quickly. Learning language is wastage of time. Do you agree or diagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'genders'' or 'gender's'?
Suggestion: genders'; gender's
... Overall, it can be incurred that both genders ratio were increase in full-time course...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 31, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...146980. Secondly, the mens proportion were fluctuate in part-time course it was hi...
^^^^
Line 11, column 36, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'fluctuated'.
Suggestion: fluctuated
...0. Secondly, the mens proportion were fluctuate in part-time course it was highest in l...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 172, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... and 2000/01, it was 113961 and 108770. Whereas, the women student were on the peak in ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, secondly, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25683060109 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66366399076 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551912568306 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.519226707 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0992523014403 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425782383067 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045890465038 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692120860108 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030747235095 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.