The tables beliw shows the distribution of students at UK university by mode of study and gender.
The tabular charts illustrate the men and women proportion enrolled in full-time and part-time postgraduate courses at UK university in four academic sessions from 1996 to 2010.
Overall, it can be incurred that both genders ratio were increase in full-time course whereas, in part-time course it showed fluctuations.
Initially, it is vividly apparent that the students enrolments in full-time courses followed an upward trend for both the genders throughout the given period. In 1996/1997 the numbers of men were more (75,370) as compared to women( 62,344). This showed the inclination during the 2000/01 and 2005/06 in ratio of both gender students it was 87,070 and 85,215 respectively. In 2009/10 the men ratio in full-time course was double as the ratio in 1996/97. The women were in full-time course, 146980.
Secondly, the mens proportion were fluctuate in part-time course it was highest in last years (138505 and 117105) rather than 1996/97 and 2000/01, it was 113961 and 108770. Whereas, the women student were on the peak in 2005/06 it was 172640. In other three academic sessions it was decline near about 10,0000 to 16,0000.
- Children are facing more pressure nowadays from academic social and commercial perspective what are the causes of this pressure and what measures should be taken to reduce this pressure 73
- As technological innovation brings about rapid change retraining becomes a lifelong necessity. Therefore, industry should be take responsibility for the education, training and retraining of their workers. To what extent do you agree to this idea. 56
- The graph show that the pollution level in london during 1550 to 2000. 78
- The graphs below show results of survey of college going boys and girls activities other than academic studies 75
- Some people think that school should educate pupils according to their academic abilities, others believe that pupils with different abilities should educate together. Discuss the both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'genders'' or 'gender's'?
Suggestion: genders'; gender's
... Overall, it can be incurred that both genders ratio were increase in full-time course...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 31, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...146980. Secondly, the mens proportion were fluctuate in part-time course it was hi...
^^^^
Line 11, column 36, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'fluctuated'.
Suggestion: fluctuated
...0. Secondly, the mens proportion were fluctuate in part-time course it was highest in l...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 172, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... and 2000/01, it was 113961 and 108770. Whereas, the women student were on the peak in ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, secondly, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25683060109 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66366399076 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551912568306 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.519226707 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0992523014403 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425782383067 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045890465038 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692120860108 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030747235095 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.