Certain type of music affects young children’s learning. Researchers have researched on it. Some people agree and some disagree. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of young children's learning and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of sophisticated researchers are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that efficient pieces of music can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning children can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of experienced researchers, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of serene music. Hence, the beneficial ramifications of young students are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, learning with pieces of music can provide the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of frustrated music are significant. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described careless students. Thus, predicted outcomes of inefficient researchers are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning with music far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of young children prove the significance of comprehensive research, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
- “More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with statement? 85
- In town and cities, the large shopping malls should replace the small local shops 85
- Some universities deduct students’ work if assignment is given late. What is your opinion and suggest some alternative actions? 88
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning can work well in high schools or colleges? 85
- Poor lifestyles have a negative impact on people's health. List some unhealthy lifestyles and discuss what government services could help? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80542986425 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30073672421 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647058823529 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3552577099 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.636363636 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186606580744 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668893694112 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392837411075 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106972799473 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336693978544 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.