tpo34-integrated
The reading passage mentions to extinction ‘s reasons of huge mammal, Steller’s sea cows which Bering Island was their inhabit and for first time reported by W.Steller, an European naturalist in 1741. While the reading uses three theories to more clarification, the professor argues the mentioned theories by reading passage.
In first place, the professor says that first theory which suggests over-hunting this animal by natives as a reason for sea cows extinction, doesn’t seem acceptable because these animals that own large size and weight, couple of them would be enough for Siberian people who population was in low rate. Therefore, over-hunting as a theory cannot support the main reason of this event.
Secondly, ecosystem disturbances which appears as a second theory, rejected by professor because a phenomena like ecosystem disturbances effects all animals life like whales but there is no evidence that reports about other animals. Furthermore, sea cows never faced with food lacking. Consequently, second theory doesn’t seem logical to prove the reasons of mentioned extinction.
Finally, trade like fur trade explains as third theory. While the passage claims that European started to hunt sea cows for fur trade after 1741 and this business caused a dramatic diminish in the mentioned animals population, professor thinks this concept cannot response to present problem due to evidence which demonstrates that before European coming their population’s volume was in low amount.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-31 | zizi.dream | 90 | view |
- TPO35-INTEGRATED 3
- Tpo36-integrated 3
- tpo34-integrated 90
- tpo36-integrated 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading passage mentions to extincti...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Steller
...nhabit and for first time reported by W.Steller, an European naturalist in 1741. While ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...d for first time reported by W.Steller, an European naturalist in 1741. While the ...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntioned theories by reading passage. In first place, the professor says that ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...upport the main reason of this event. Secondly, ecosystem disturbances which a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...like ecosystem disturbances effects all animals life like whales but there is no eviden...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the reasons of mentioned extinction. Finally, trade like fur trade explains a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63043478261 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89496009486 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613043478261 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 104.23915996 49.2860985944 211% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 143.888888889 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7777777778 7.06452816374 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338197090615 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132292578656 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944921743189 0.0662205650399 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202819232393 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378659779295 0.0443174109184 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.3589403974 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.2367328918 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.