Some people believe that all the children in school are required to learn at least one foreign language. However, others say that those who are not talented do not have to learn. What is your opinion?
Some schools of thought assert that it is compulsory for children to learn a new language in school while the others believe children without talent should be immune from that. this is a controversial issue regarding the essential of learning foreign languages, and labelling students in class.
To begin with, weighing the role of a new language affects on children is essential. Knowing a new language rather than the mother tongue allows children to communicate with the foreigners. For example, young people can socialize, open the networks and make friends with those come from many parts of the world. There are also several opportunities such as studying abroad with a scholarship or working in a foreign country are provided to students with foreign language ability. For instance, many young Vietnamese students who successfully won scholarships from various universities in the U.S, due to the ability of fluently using English. Additionally, scientific researches have proved that learning another language enhance the brain performance to certain extent, and by virtue of that, the children capacity is also improve in a general scale.
Despite such benefits from learning a foreign language, the act of labelling students in the case of young learners who is not success in learning language is unacceptable and irresponsible. The discouragement that those received may be harmful to the overall development of them such as dropping out school. Weak students may leave school in early stage of life because of that, and hence, this must be eliminated at all cost. In turn, it is critical point out to the young generations the necessary of acquiring another language as this may nurture the love of learning languages in each children.
To conclude, students should be encouraged to learn another language for their own benefits rather than applying enforcement on all or discouragement on less talented learners.
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems What are those problems In order to reduce the problems should we discourage people to use cars 61
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Some people agree, some others disagree. Discuss both view. 84
- The three pie charts below show the change in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 67
- The chart gives information about the amount of oil discovered worldwide from 1950 to 2020 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...hout talent should be immune from that. this is a controversial issue regarding the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 595, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...hips from various universities in the U.S, due to the ability of fluently using E...
^
Line 5, column 825, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'improved'.
Suggestion: improved
... of that, the children capacity is also improve in a general scale. Despite such b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, regarding, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34640522876 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94097312296 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7821026713 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.846153846 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233738213978 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834063247837 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600527187393 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155918607065 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660072502594 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.