Some people think that children should learn to compete, but others think that they should be taught to cooperate with others. What’s your opinion?
Methods of children interactions with society and their peers at school in particular, have been an attention-grabbing issue among educators, recently. While cooperative work is deemed to be more practical for children by a myriad of individuals, including myself, some opine the opposite, believing that competing may translate into better outcomes.
Cooperative work refers to a group of activities among people in order to accomplish a common goal. Working in a group, children experience how to collaborate with each other while exerting their strength, expertise and aptitude to achieve their group’s thoroughly implemented purposes. This approach, if is placed value on, not only does culminate in productivity and satisfaction among team members, but also has positively a striking correlation between children’s adjustment to their community, during their adolescence.
On the other hand, however, collaborative interaction may not be as practical as it appears, for some gifted children in particular. To be exact, team-work has favorable outcomes for ordinary children, as they acquire know-how from other pupils, while the smart category might be disenchanted following operating on some routinely scheduled team programs. To diminish negative repercussions, some inter-group activities for talented clusters, semblance to which considered in Japanese schools, play a pivotal role in imparting satisfaction, if they are wisely planned.
In way of conclusion, although cooperative work may fail to fulfill some unique, skillful group members’ acquisition urge, the better it is managed to be deeply ingrained among learners, the more outstanding results including productivity, would be obtained.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-31 | miladrezaee | 56 | view |
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both views an 84
- The leisure industry is growing rapidly The active rate of modern technology in people s leisure lives nowadays has made them less creative Do you agree or disagree 86
- Some people believe that research into family history is useful for the next generations, while others claim that present and future are more important.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person’s culture and character from their choice of clothes.Do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, while, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.97983870968 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35880803876 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.673387096774 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.301314319 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.777777778 106.682146367 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5555555556 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188527684186 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810297340675 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03015961618 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112744744636 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210106322877 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 50.2224549098 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 11.3001002004 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.7 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.41 8.58950901804 133% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.