Some parents say that giving expensive gifts to a child can create bad habits in him/her. Do you agree or disagree?
Giving gift to the friends, and close family particularly children in the special ceremonies such as birthday change to a common event among people around the globe. Some people believe that buying expensive gifts for children can have negative impact on their habits. Personally, I agree with this idea. My reasons for this position mentioned as follows.
This is a proven fact that the individuals personality in adult shape in the child period. If parents teach them saving in cost, for example, they learn cost management at future. About the gift also, this subject may influenced on their chose in case of purchase goods at the future. If they get highly cost gifts, consequently, they habit for buying expensive devices when they will grow up. As a result, this trend may create serious obstacles for parents or their expose like financial problems.
Secondly, the aim of giving presents to child is creating motivation, encourage, and aspiration them for more effort. However, I think costly gifts not just cannot create more incentive in him/his, but it causes a sense of expectation. For example, I remembered my father gave me a bull as birthday gift, and I really excited at that moment, but nowadays, in spite of that all children have tablet, video game and so on, nonetheless, they are not satisfied and like have be more valuable instruments.
To sum up, the buying of valuable presents for children cannot be suitable idea for creating motivate at them, but it rises their expectation, and cause problems for them at future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-09 | mohamadi654094 | 86 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | mohamadi654094 | 81 | view |
- Some parents say that giving expensive gifts to a child can create bad habits in him her Do you agree or disagree 81
- Some people think that it is the responsibility of governments to take care of the environment, while others believe that it is the responsibility of people to take care of the environment.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- Fossil fuels (e.g. coals, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind and solar) have been encouraged to be used by some countries.To what extent is this a positive or negative developme 84
- training parents for bringing their children 56
- why teenagers are unknown with the past culture?what solutions there are for resolve it? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ws. This is a proven fact that the individuals personality in adult shape in the chil...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat the individuals personality in adult shape in the child period. If parents te...
^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to cost'
Suggestion: to cost
...saving in cost, for example, they learn cost management at future. About the gift al...
^^^^
Line 9, column 472, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...s, they are not satisfied and like have be more valuable instruments. To sum ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, nonetheless, really, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, such as, as a result, in spite of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04651162791 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63156601953 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4018758343 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.153846154 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6923076923 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153444100851 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591607022772 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410944601528 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903081037107 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424449639358 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.