TPO 13
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">The lecture mainly contradicts the author's arguments stating that the business around fossils is an unfortunate problem for society. The professor doesn't believe that the problem is as critical compared to what the passage portraits, and refutes each of the author's reasons.
Foremost, the reading states that people can not have access to private collections to observe fossils. The professor, however, assesses these points by stating that there are still many interesting fossils for public exhibitions, and the fossils are not as scarce as the author believes. The professor adds that thanks to the collectors many fossils are available, to illustrate her idea; This plainly shows that, even with less budget, institutes can buy many fossils for both science and public's satisfaction.
According to the article, scientists miss important information, because they can not purchase many fossils. In contrast, the professor says that fossils' values are determined by researchers; in fact, they are passed through the scientific community. She concedes that the final destination of many fossils is the house of collectors, but this does not mean that the scientific community is missing information about those fossils.
Finally, the author wraps her argument positioning that much data about the origins of fossils destroys by commercial collectors. The professor says that this claim is problematic; this is because, if collectors were not collecting fossils, there would not be as many fossils compared to now. According to the professor, many fossils would not have been found without the commercial discovery groups; therefore, these minor mistakes are acceptable.
To sum tp, both the author and the lecturer hold conflicting ideas about the commercial collector's position in fossils' discovery. they have a hard time finding common ground about the issue.</span><br>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...nate problem for society. The professor doesnt believe that the problem is as critical...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 57, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...hor wraps her argument positioning that much data about the origins of fossils destr...
^^^^
Line 9, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...llectors position in fossils discovery. they have a hard time finding common ground ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, so, still, therefore, in contrast, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69097222222 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10665720062 2.5805825403 120% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5414554341 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.076923077 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405508363855 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147365799495 0.0996497079465 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724972274074 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22378966605 0.162205337803 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851720091498 0.0443174109184 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.2367328918 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.