Do you think consumers should avoid over-packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers?
Over-packaging of food products has become a trend to make it look attractive to customers. Some people opine that over-packaging should be avoided by buyers while others believe that it should be eliminated by the producers. This essay will discuss why the producers should avoid over-packaging in order to reduce the item prices and help to combat the harmful effects on the environment.
Firstly, over-packaging of the eatables costs more to the consumers, because the money is shelled out from their pockets for the shimmery packagings. It eventually increases the market price of the actual product and can become non-affordable for some people. Manufacturers should pay attention to the price rather than packaging.
Secondly, lots of wrapping material is made of paper and plastic and it should be avoided since paper wraps come from cutting down trees and plastic is already a major contributor to climate change. For example, amazon use plastic to cover the products then puts them in a cardboard box and then seals it in a plastic bag. Rather it can just send the item in the box avoiding two layers of plastic covering. Hence, producers can eliminate over-packaging.
In conclusion, it can be reiterated that it becomes the responsibility of the producers to avoid the over-packaging of foods at their level so that it doesn't cause the value of the goods to inflate and this will also help in reducing plastic pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | heemagupta | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | maniram vicky | 72 | view |
| 2019-10-05 | raavi sandhu | 80 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Ekta shah | 77 | view |
- In towns and cities, the large shopping malls should replace the small local shops. Do you agree or disagree? 55
- Do you think consumers should avoid over-packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? 77
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals Real change can be made at the government level What extent do you agree or disagree 58
- Do you think consumers should avoid over-packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 324, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...box and then seals it in a plastic bag. Rather it can just send the item in the box av...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 152, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ging of foods at their level so that it doesnt cause the value of the goods to inflate...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, look, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1211.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1313559322 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01007059599 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563559322034 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.998332584 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.090909091 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293682846944 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111902787712 0.0925447433944 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665918907382 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180068915669 0.151781067708 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883980982735 0.0609392437508 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.