Some people think it is better to live in countryside to have a healthy lifestyle, while others claim that city has more health benefits. Discuss both views and give your own opinion?
Undoubtedly, it is often said that health is wealth and a healthy man can live a happier life. However, a majority of people deem that ruler areas are beneficial for humans to stay here because these are less polluted, full with greenery and give vast knowledge about cultures as well as history. In contrast, the another section of society supports urban areas to live the reason is that citified fields are providing higher facilities like an education, transport services, medical facilities and so on, opportunities of jobs as well. This easy will shed light on both the prospective along with my perception.
The one school of thought consider that villages are environmental friendly so it is better for those people who are enduring from perilous ailments to stay there. Moreover, the main factor is that the atmosphere of countryside are less polluted rather than cities. Adding in this, a vast amount of industrial sectors and factories which release detrimental steaming and chemical in water pounds are not established here at big levels. In addition to this, the roads of ruler areas are never filled with vehicles as compared with metropolitan sectors who polluted the surroundings. Furthermore, the another prose is that villages are representing a picturesque scenery of greenery due to their fields because most people of countryside are doing husbandry to earn bread and butter. In other words, ruler areas are big box of knowledge related to cultures, traditions and history. For example, in many villages of Rajasthan, where lots of temples, forts and other palaces Had developed which give huge knowledge about our cultures and history to everyone.
The another school of thought believes that cosmopolitan areas are good for masses to stay the reason is that these offering lots of advantages. Apart from this, an initial is that urban areas are providing so many facilities to humans such as higher education, varieties of transport system as well as so many big hospitals and doctors for every kinds of treatments and etcetera. Additionally, these services play crucial roles to enhance the standard of living dramatically. Moving further, the second major bright side is that cities are giving vastly chances of jobs to jobless people. For instance, a vast amount of companies, offices and other businesses are set up in metropolitan areas which demanding so much labourers, employers to run their businesses. Even though, that is the reason a huge number of jobs are opening for unemployed in urban areas.
In my opinion, villages are cities are similar for people to live because they both are offering so many services which are essential for humans to live healthier. Beside that, countryside and cosmopolitan areas have their own importance in people’s lives which allows them to choose palace for staying according their desires.
In conclusion, although, citified areas giving great deals of high standards facilities to live happily but ruler areas offer huge knowledge about cultures, history and to protect environment.
- Nowadays media should include more good news in their publications. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 89
- The chart shows the components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The two pie charts below show the percentage of industry sectors’s contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016. 56
- In many cities today, most people live in a large apartments blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages? 78
- The charts below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 714, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...n metropolitan areas which demanding so much labourers, employers to run their busin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, well, apart from, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 13.1623246493 228% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 7.30460921844 274% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2597.0 1615.20841683 161% => OK
No of words: 491.0 315.596192385 156% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28920570265 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78591249681 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 176.041082164 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50916496945 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 820.8 506.74238477 162% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6422868889 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.85 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.55 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135208200805 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425148544718 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397340946633 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0849279217098 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049968710966 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.