Lectures given by teachers in universities used to be the only way of teaching students, however, nowadays technology has evolved and made it possible to study online. This causes many people to believe that the lecture system will not be needed in the future. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Bygone days, lecturing in universities was the only means where pupils were taught. However, nowadays, due to advancements in technology; the online study system is dominating the lecture system predominantly. I opine the later one will replace the old lecturing system in universities due to the advancement in the technology and the way youths want to handle multi-tasking along with studies.
First and foremost, in this contemporary world, imparting knowledge in universities has become old-fashioned for most of the current generations. To exemplify, nowadays, because of the internet, everything related to studies, like, lecturing videos, teachers' notes, books and simulators of lab equipment are available at the fingertip. Furthermore, a lot of simulators are available online for practical purposes. Thus, in the future, online studies might overrule the lecturing system.
Secondly, the majority of pupil likes to do multi-tasking along with their studies. Moreover, they want to study whenever they feel free. In the lecturer system, they have to sit in the class for the whole day. Students might feel unnecessary, and they prefer to study whenever they are free. For that very reason, they prefer online studies. Also, improvement in the current online-technology might, of course, will lead internet studies to replace the lecture system, in the future.
To recapitulate, in the future, there is a lot of scopes for online studies to overtake the lecture system. The easy access to worldwide information, the availability of lecturing videos on the internet and also the way of handling multitasking with the help of the internet has become easier. Hence, in the future, it looks like there is no need for teachers giving lecturing in universities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-14 | vinay kadam | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Greeshma vs | 96 | view |
- It has been said that the world is becoming a global village in which there are no boundaries to trade and communication. Do the benefits of globalisation outweigh the drawbacks? 61
- Lectures given by teachers in universities used to be the only way of teaching students, however, nowadays technology has evolved and made it possible to study online. This causes many people to believe that the lecture system will not be needed in the fu 67
- Some people think that new technology always improves the lives of workers. Other people believe that it results in disadvantages for workers.Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 73
- Some people think competitive sports, such as football, are valuable because they can gather people with different ages and cultures together. Some think competitive sports can cause problems because people are from different groups and countries. Discuss 56
- Some people think that new technology always improves the lives of workers. Other people believe that it results in disadvantages for workers.Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s might overrule the lecturing system. Secondly, the majority of pupil likes to...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ace the lecture system, in the future. To recapitulate, in the future, there is...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45454545455 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0949791385 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523636363636 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4937753297 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.75 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1875 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225841749339 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829789859491 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593938836897 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152875011252 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538554866714 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.