Some people believe theoretical subjects( e.g mathematics, philosophy, and economy) should not be taught in universities because they should focus on practical subjects (e.g marketing, computer programming, and accounting)
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People found more percent of knowledge from university and high school. Subjects of many types teach in the school even if children and students do not like it at all. They want to more learn that just enjoyed subjects. In high schools teach many subjects and some of those subjects still teach in a university. But some people think that instead of teaching which theoretical subjects are mathematics, philosophy, and the economy at university, it should focus on practical subjects.
All of it, I think that it has two sides. On the one hand, theoretical subjects are not unnecessary subjects. This subject researched many students, and their achievement successful. Science of mathematics and economy are the most important in calculating somethings. But philosophy explores the soul, behavior, and else somethings.
Marketing, computer programming, and accounting are the main subjects of practical subjects. Because those subjects still popular in the labor market. But these subjects, not the most important major and one side of essential to learn subjects. Marketing has been improving rapidly recently, and it used to correct a lot of company increase income. Accounting needs to be all companies at first and it still at the moment. Nowadays computer has been developing rapidly. Thus, all sectors use a computer in activities.
In my opinion, these subjects do not compare subjects. But must be it in each sector. In the information time, students can choose to get themselves needs subjects. So teachers of the university should teach with good quality and students need to learn enough.
- A foreign visitor has only one day to spend in your country. Where should this visitor go on that day? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice. 56
- In today’s society, both Western medicine and traditional, complementary forms of medicines are now widely known and used. The effectiveness oft kinds of treatment is determined by the patient's mental attitude towards it.To what extent do you agre 56
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Some people believe theoretical subjects e g mathematics philosophy and economy should not be taught in universities because they should focus on practical subjects e g marketing computer programming and accounting To what extent do you agree or disagree 52
- Some people believe that capital punishment should not be used Others however argue that it should be allowed for the most serious crimes Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he main subjects of practical subjects. Because those subjects still popular in the lab...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, thus, i think, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28515625 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87395690571 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 0.809619238477 1112% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5304140078 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.4285714286 106.682146367 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.1904761905 20.7667163134 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.61904761905 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295474473189 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807683771709 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908325372283 0.0667982634062 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159051073414 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650066723311 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 50.2224549098 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.51 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.