Too much emphasis is being placed on going university for academic education. People should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a shortage of qualified tradespeople.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
By a great many people, professional preparing is viewed as a disgraceful break course for the individuals who are not shrewd enough to go to universities. Presently that the shortage of qualified experts, for example, development laborers, circuit testers, and smithies is getting progressively intense, some have recommended that more individuals ought to be urged to experience professional preparing. I provide a reason to feel ambiguous about no the veracity of this announcement.
there are various advantages that can be derived from going to exchange schools, rather than colleges. In the first place, programs of professional schools are regularly shorter. All the more exceptionally, while students need to focus on in any event 3 years of full-time study, it takes just 1 or 2 years for students to get certain particular certifications. Furthermore, the principal focal point of professional projects is on giving hands-on experience to students and there is no requirement for them to ponder subjects. The prime model for this is Vietnamese students, paying little respect to what majors they pursue, are obliged to contemplate ideas of the socialist party while students of exchange schools don't need to. For this reason, their employability is altogether upgraded.
Regardless of such focal points, many are still skeptical about taking professional preparing as it doesn't offer a lot of flexibility. I recognize that the profession decisions are significantly more restricted for professional students and that there is a minimal possibility for them to change their vocation in the event that they want to. In any case, if students get appropriate vocation direction program before leaving on their learning, scarcely any off-base choices will be made.
Everything considered I can be slanted to repeat that professional preparing should never again be kept on the periphery of the instructive framework and that it ought to be energized among students of all degrees of education.
- The charts below shows the number of girls per 100 boys in all levels of education. 73
- The pie chart shows the main reasons what agriculture land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three region of the world during the 1990s. 73
- The diagram shows the environmental issues raised by a product over its life cycle. 67
- The bar chart shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity of 2014. 78
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of country more important than the international music that is hard everywhere nowadays 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 449, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...rovide a reason to feel ambiguous about no the veracity of this announcement. ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...veracity of this announcement. there are various advantages that can be deri...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 719, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...arty while students of exchange schools dont need to. For this reason, their employa...
^^^^
Line 13, column 101, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...out taking professional preparing as it doesnt offer a lot of flexibility. I recognize...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, still, while, for example, in particular, in any case, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50482315113 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19850204288 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588424437299 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1716496964 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.692307692 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159394027095 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534346304014 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0413689590552 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104466204217 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273981916302 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.