Those days, more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work. What could be the reasons for this? Do you think it is a positive or o negative development?
In recent decades, it is true that more women are playing the role of breadwinner, whilst men being househusbands have been quite the norm. This following essay aimed to examine the major reasons for this phenomenon and present my opinion on whether this development is positive.
Admittedly, there are a number of contributing factors responsible for why females have a tendency to leave their homes for making money purposes. Over the last many years, equal allowances, which means individuals have to adapt to social changes movements have made progress. Wives now not only have more time for themselves but also have more chances to gain more qualifications paving their career path, whereas it has become acceptable for husbands to shoulder childcare obligations. Another explanation is that the cost of living would be increasing. In particular, both men and women have to prepare for their future family life, therefore, they can split the burden with their spouse. As a result, when couples have children, they can decide who goes to work and who stays at home relied on personal preference or which partner can make ends meet more money.
It is vividly the fact that society and the government would reap certain benefits from the significance of reality. For the best, the more money these females earn, the more taxes they would pay to assist the community and the state with governmental systems such as health care, education, and infrastructure, etc, which means it releases the heave burden on the authority. Not to mention that the stable financial conditions maybe create a satisfying feeling that sometimes denotes happiness for both wives and husbands. Image if there were not enough expenses to live due to the only a person makes money, they would conflict on a daily basis, and the social surroundings them as well as the state would unavoidably get in complete disarray. In short, without contributing and dividing the financial burden of women, the family and the authority would fail to thrive.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the earning money of females generates the merits than its drawbacks. The government should issue policies to encourage wives working more through creating more job opportunities that suit women.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | sysengron | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | Harrynguyen1980 | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | salesforcetest59@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-29 | Tolik | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-20 | Ravi Grewal | 89 | view |
- In many countries, the cost of living is rising. What are the effects on individuals and society? What measures could be taken to deal with this problem? 78
- Some people think that newly built houses in the local areas, while others think that people should have the freedom to build houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Men do most of the high-level jobs. Should governments encourage a certain rate of these jobs to be for women? 84
- Computers are being more and more in education and so there will soon be no role for the teacher in education.To what extents do you agree or disagree? 73
- The cheap airline encourages people to travel, however, it affects the environmental problems so the cost should be increased to discourage people to travel. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more job opportunities that suit women.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, well, whereas, in conclusion, in particular, in short, such as, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14402173913 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7219079312 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60597826087 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0183888377 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.2 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.93333333333 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171679044969 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05316894596 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473311494632 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0996837483346 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489468468694 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.