The pie charts below show the most common advantages and disadvantages of Bowen Island, according to a survey of visitors.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts represent what tourists consider to be the pros and cons of Bowen Island.
Overall, it is evident that the most common complaint visitors have of Bowen Island is its high expenses. Meanwhile, the people of the island prove to be the most popular characteristic of the island among tourists.
Half of the survey participants find the prices at Bowen Island too prohibitive. A quarter of respondents cited entertainment options as a disadvantage of the island, making it the second most common disadvantage cited. Making up the remaining 25% are the food quality and the weather conditions found on the island, in third and last place respectively.
As for the advantages of Bowen Island in the eye of tourists, 42% of survey participants appreciated the local people, while roughly a third of them were pleased by the scenery. Similar in popularity among the tourists surveyed, housing facilities and the culture of the island also received acclaim, recording 11% and 12% respectively.
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan. 73
- The table below shows the results of a 20 year study into why adults in the UK attend arts events Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- The first chart below shows the number of British visitors to the US and American visitors to the UK from 2011 to 2015 The second chart shows the amount spent by those visitors in that period 59
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The table below gives information about the amount of beef exported in five different countries in 2012, 2014 and 2016.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, third, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22699386503 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99568736653 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.601226993865 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7763178326 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255635827716 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11175250541 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501553338967 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152387745129 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401191659281 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.