The graph show that the pollution level in london during 1550 to 2000.
The linear chart illustrates the information about the pollution level in london which, increased due to sulphur dioxide and smoke from 1550 to 2000 years.
Overall, it can be incurred that the both gases inclined by passing the time and then, decreased in last years.
Initially, it is vividly apparent that the sulphur dioxide introduced in 1600 at negligible point of pollution. The same trend followed by the smoke. In the next hundred years, both went up the foremost reached at almost 750 micrograms per cubic metre. Whereas, the latter gas noticed at less than 250 micrograms ( m3). after that the sulphuric acid showed increment during 1800 to 1900 near about 1000 micrograms before, some downfalls less than 750. The smoke had contributed in pollution level less than 250 to about 400 micrograms .
Secondly, in 1900 the sulphuric dioxide and smoke declined and, it stayed at 500 and more than 250 micrograms. after this, in last years it fluctuated and reached at same point where, the level of pollution stared.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-09 | Estriper | view |
- Some people think that school should educate pupils according to their academic abilities others believe that pupils with different abilities should educate together Discuss the both views and give your opinion 61
- Some businesses find that their new employee lack in basic interpersonal skills such as the lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team. What are the causes and suggest possible solution. Also provide relevant example from your experience 56
- Many children these days have their own mobile phones what are the advantages and disadvantages of it. 67
- The picture below shows a daily routine of the people ina specific day. 78
- Many offenders are commit more crimes after serving their first punishment. Why is this happening and which measures can be taken to tackle this problem. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 254, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... almost 750 micrograms per cubic metre. Whereas, the latter gas noticed at less than 25...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... gas noticed at less than 250 micrograms m3. after that the sulphuric acid showed...
^^
Line 9, column 319, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...oticed at less than 250 micrograms m3. after that the sulphuric acid showed incremen...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 533, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...el less than 250 to about 400 micrograms . Secondly, in 1900 the sulphuric dioxi...
^^
Line 11, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...ed at 500 and more than 250 micrograms. after this, in last years it fluctuated and r...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second, secondly, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06470588235 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52070527097 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605882352941 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3936299271 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168058194247 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596942631768 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086203652341 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106270284967 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101225179773 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.