MORE YOUNG PEOPLE ARE LEAVING THEIR RURAL AREAS TO URBAN CITIES TO STUDY AND WORK. WHAT DO YOU THINK ARE THE REASONS? DO ADVANATGES OUTWEIGH ITS DISADVANTAGES?
Urban cities are witnessing more and more people moving in for the sake of education and job. In my opinion, this is mainly because of the environment as well as opportunities that cities offer. I also believe, although there are advantages, migration of junior citizens to urban centers can lead to too many problems.
Firstly, the reason for most young individuals willing to enroll at universities in cities is due to the environment, which is hard to exist in countries. In other words, cities are the hubs of confounding flurry of activities where students can learn not only through books but also experience, which in turn will enable them to get the most out of education. Secondly, more people leaving their home town is also owing to the job opportunities, which means cities offer the promise of social mobility. At the moment, the gap between haves and have-nots in cities is far less than in rural areas and this implies that cities now are the powerful vehicles to create wealth. Moreover, people enjoying the city life are finding it easier to reach the apex of the career ladder.
Having more students and employees in big cities would result in decrease of unemployment but there will also be more drawbacks. One evident benefit is that it would enable students and job seekers to find a job as urban areas are the engines of economic success. However, there are obvious disadvantages. First, the more people come to cities the more accommodation they need and if governments do not tackle this problem humanely, they will end up living in awful conditions. Second, even if countries find a way to accommodate all, we will go into environment crisis, namely carbon footprint. This would not only be a green problem, but also a major security threat. As a result, the next conflicts, wars and terrorist attacks will be triggered.
In conclusion, young people will not stop leaving their rural areas unless they find opportunities in their own countryside and while there are plus points of this migration, too much would be lost as a result. Therefore, governments should stop practicing favoritism towards cities in particular and should invest more in the countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-01 | AnvayAwalgaonkar | 78 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some touristfacilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant.Write 11
- The maps show the development of Happy Valley Shopping Center Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 79
- https://www.bestmytest.com/ielts/ielts-academic-writing/49 11
- MORE YOUNG PEOPLE ARE LEAVING THEIR RURAL AREAS TO URBAN CITIES TO STUDY AND WORK. WHAT DO YOU THINK ARE THE REASONS? DO ADVANATGES OUTWEIGH ITS DISADVANTAGES? 78
- SOME PEOPLE THINK IT IS A GOOD THING FOR SENIOUR MANAGEMENT POSITIONS TO HAVE VERY HIGH SALARIES COMPARED TO OTHER WORKERS OF THE SAME COMPANY OR ORGANISATION. TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 339, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd should invest more in the countries.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in particular, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00272479564 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74477957888 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547683923706 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1027425804 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5882352941 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229172147193 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677000426618 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577639217022 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142511087853 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221327116514 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.