Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
Different people have different types of pyschology, and thus their attitudes vary. It is difficult to find the same behaviour and pattern among these diverse range of people. It is axiomatic that that people choose their subject matter on the basis of their desires and interest while the people who choose the subject or a field of study on the basis of availabilty of jobs were rare success. I am in consonant with first part of the contentions and non-consonants with the second half with these evidences.
It is hard to get success in the field which we have less interest. The work which were performed by only observing with opportunity does not seems perfect. Many of the world scientist and eminent personality who have got success have their interests in certain fields and later they have got success. For instances--Bill Gates--Founder of Microsoft have left the course of Law in the intermittent of Bachelor level, and, later he joined and started the Microsoft--he has great desire in this field, and thus he got success. Many other researcher, in small level too, got their success when they have performed their work with passion. Any normal student can get a good grade, if he give the examination in the subjects with his preferences.
In this developing world, eveything is ephemeral and transient. The demands of certain job varies with different instances of time. For instances--there is high demanding of weapon tools during the 1940's to 1980's. However, this market has not abated, and, even with the impeachment of Donald Trump; these market has slumped. Similarly, today there is market of technology; one day it may be shift towards the human satisfaction and happinessThus, due to these transient nature of job opportunity; it will be pernicious to any students to choose the subjects on the availabilty rather than their own interest.
With the diverse range of people and their attitude, when they performed the study and work with their own interest; diverse sectors can be commensurately developed. It will be greatly innocuous towards the overall development of any country--in all terms. While, people with the diverse interest work towards their respective field--each area will be entrenched.
In conclusion, only with the selectivity of field of study with the talents and interest; can only perform better in their future life and as a whole it leads to the country towards the sustainability.
It is why every parents should let their children to study the subjects with their interest; and which finally would let a good results in the career of any students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | sandeshbhandari2 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | shingwa | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | lucy2244 | 79 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | kevlarpeng | 66 | view |
- In the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay inorder to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their emplo 85
- Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates, has grown into a 80
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field. 62
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire villag 61
- "Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life areentirely harmless, they in fact, prevent people from developing into truly strong andindependent individuals." 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seem'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: seem
...nly observing with opportunity does not seems perfect. Many of the world scientist an...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'seem'
Suggestion: seem
...nly observing with opportunity does not seems perfect. Many of the world scientist an...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 684, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'gives'.
Suggestion: gives
...mal student can get a good grade, if he give the examination in the subjects with hi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...velopment of any country--in all terms. While, people with the diverse interest work ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, second, similarly, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2180.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08158508159 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87058370609 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496503496503 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7997491634 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.45 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250587887767 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756014017745 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710278329882 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143777886442 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336234394515 0.0667264976115 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.