The chart shows the annual GDP growth rates in 3 countries from 2007 to 2010.
Compared in the bar chart are the yearly rates of GDP growth in Tunisia, Japan and Ecuador between 2007 and 2010.
It is evident that while Japan enjoyed an upward trend in its GDP growth rate over the course of the recorded years, whereas the remaining nations experienced a downward trend. Moreover, Tunisia’s leading position was overtaken by Japan in the second half of the period.
In 2007, at over 6%, Tunisia had the highest GDP growth rate among the three surveyed countries. It was followed by Ecuador in second place, at slightly above 3%, while Japan only recorded 2%. Just one year later, Japan and Ecuador’s GDP growth rate both increased by approximately 2 percentage points; however, Tunisia saw a drop of similar magnitude in its figures.
The spell between 2008 and 2010 marked growth in Japan’s figures, ultimately concluding at 6.5%, whereas the rates for Tunisia fell steadily, recording only half of its 2007 figure in 2010. As for Ecuador, after peaking in 2008, its rates plunged to barely more than 1% in 2009. However, 2010 saw recovery for this Latin American country, which recorded a rate of 2%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the average number of Vietnamese students studying in France, Russia and America between 2000 and 2015. 73
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 75
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010. 73
- The table below gives information about the amount of beef exported in five different countries in 2012 2014 and 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, second, whereas, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05759162304 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59628857111 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607329842932 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6727402981 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260661931946 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126134949732 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108277516652 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199425147372 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998833331018 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.