The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.
These pie graphs compare the disposal methods of hazardous waste products in three different nations-Republic of Korea, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
Republic of Korea and Sweden show a similar way on disposing of hazardous waste. It is accounted at 69% of this waste is recycled in Korea while it is a quarter in Sweden. This is followed by 22% of these dangerous waste goods buried underground in Korea which is almost three times less than Sweden (55%). The rest of the dangerous waste goods is caught out in incineration which is a way to burn the waste by fire in Korea and Sweden, at 9% for the former and 20% for the latter.
In contrast, the United Kingdom indicates a completely different solution to deal with dangerous waste. The remarkable method is burying the waste underground which occupied the largest proportion at 82%. The rest of the waste is dealt with chemical treatment, dumpling at sea and incineration at 8%, 8% and 2% respectively.
Overall, it is clear that although recycling is the main method to deal with dangerous waste good, bury underground the major way in other nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-09 | Awadhesh Mourya | 73 | view |
- Some people say the government should give the health care the first priorities some others believe there are more important priorities to spend the taxpayers money Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Many people do not fee safe either at home or when they out. What are the causes and what can be done to solve this. 78
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries. 67
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 82
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011. The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one-person households. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92105263158 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78641341566 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521052631579 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5409320548 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225091873985 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968999306761 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390785488118 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141953439037 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182287937721 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.